11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
230<br />
mobile home for persons <strong>of</strong> gypsy status with additional tree planting,<br />
landscaping, access and gateway.’ Three conditions were appended to that<br />
appeal decision. These were:<br />
Condition 1 -The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the<br />
expiration <strong>of</strong> three years from the date <strong>of</strong> this permission.<br />
Condition 2 -The site shall not be occupied by any person other than gypsies<br />
and travellers as defined in paragraph 15 <strong>of</strong> ODPM Circular 01/2006.<br />
Condition 3 - No more than two caravans, as defined in the Caravan Sites and<br />
Control <strong>of</strong> Development Act 1960 and the Caravan Sites Act 1968 (<strong>of</strong> which<br />
no more than 1 shall be a static caravan or mobile home) shall be stationed<br />
on the site at any time.<br />
7.0 THE BREACH OF PLANNING CONTROL<br />
7.1 The breach <strong>of</strong> planning control is as set out in the Enforcement Notice issued<br />
on <strong>11</strong> July 2006, that is to say, ‘without planning permission, the change <strong>of</strong><br />
use <strong>of</strong> agricultural land to use for the stationing <strong>of</strong> a park home.’<br />
7.2 The occupiers <strong>of</strong> the site’s agent disputes the validity <strong>of</strong> the enforcement<br />
notice given the recent appeal decision. However, whilst planning permission<br />
has been granted for a mobile home through the appeal and approval in<br />
January, the crucial factor here is that the park home on site does not benefit<br />
from that permission. In the latest appeal decision, the Inspector deliberately<br />
excludes it from consideration, instead determining whether the use <strong>of</strong> the<br />
land as a site for occupation by a person <strong>of</strong> gypsy and traveller status was<br />
acceptable. In this regard she appended a condition which excluded the park<br />
home on site from being authorised, by allowing a caravan/mobile home only<br />
if it complied with the definition as set out in the Caravan Sites and Control <strong>of</strong><br />
Development Act 1960 and the Caravan Sites Act 1968. Paragraph 4 <strong>of</strong> the<br />
appeal decision makes it clear that the park home on site is not a caravan for<br />
the purposes <strong>of</strong> planning law, due to its width and the conservatory and utility<br />
area attached. Therefore the Local Planning Authority’s view is that the<br />
structure remains unauthorised as set out in the enforcement notice in 2006.<br />
7.3 Section 180 <strong>of</strong> the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, which refers to an<br />
enforcement notice ceasing to have effect where there is a later grant <strong>of</strong><br />
planning permission, only applies to an enforcement notice to the extent that it<br />
is inconsistent with a later grant <strong>of</strong> planning permission. In this case, the<br />
conditional planning permission obtained under planning reference<br />
10/00200/F for ‘siting <strong>of</strong> mobile home for persons <strong>of</strong> gypsy status with<br />
additional tree planting, landscaping, access and gateway’, is not inconsistent<br />
with the requirements <strong>of</strong> the notice to cease the use <strong>of</strong> the land for the<br />
stationing <strong>of</strong> a park home, because <strong>of</strong> the reasons explained above.<br />
8.0 THE PLANNING HARM PRESENTLY CAUSED<br />
8.1 Conditional planning permission has been granted in accordance with Circular<br />
01/2006, which provides special policy framework for assessing caravan sites