07.01.2013 Views

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

SUPPORTING CASE<br />

Proposal<br />

This proposal and application arises from circumstances on site raised by an Officer in the<br />

Planning Department<br />

The only item that is the subject <strong>of</strong> this proposal which has not had previous consideration<br />

and approval is the siting <strong>of</strong> the House and its North elevations in respect to the Northern<br />

boundary.<br />

In other respects the House has approval and has been completed to that approval.<br />

The North gable in its completed position is located such that the difference between<br />

approved and as built is small in both distance and effect.<br />

Background<br />

The whole site has an approval for 6 Houses to be constructed and all but 2 have been<br />

completed. Plot 3 proposal has had amendments approved firstly for a change <strong>of</strong> design and<br />

secondly handing <strong>of</strong> the design and this has been constructed.<br />

The House has been completed for almost 2 years in its present form and was under<br />

construction for 10 months before then.<br />

The latest approval is an extant approval for a House <strong>of</strong> this form on this plot.<br />

Siting<br />

The Authority’s Officers originally mentioned that the House is positioned in a location not<br />

approved and that in respect to both the North boundary and the East boundary the House<br />

was some 500– 600mm nearer for the North and 600mm nearer than the East respectively.<br />

Further measurements commissioned by the Applicant have shown that with regard to the<br />

East boundary this is not the case and the location is within tolerances generally agreed as<br />

acceptable. The differential is between - 0.1 and + 0.150 and as such is acceptable as being<br />

correct.<br />

The dimension to the North as measured by the Authority’s Officers for the face <strong>of</strong> the wall<br />

range from 0950mm to <strong>11</strong>40mm but further measurements have shown that the dimensions<br />

in fact are 1000mm to <strong>11</strong>40mm and these have been generally accepted as correct in<br />

Officer discussions.<br />

The scaled dimension as the gap between the faces <strong>of</strong> the wall and the North gable is<br />

agreed at the Local Authority’s figure <strong>of</strong> 1500mm as the approved dimension.<br />

It can be seen that on the face <strong>of</strong> it the North gable is some 500mm down to 360mm nearer<br />

to the wall face than scaled from the drawing.<br />

A distance <strong>of</strong> 1000mm is commonplace in positioning buildings adjacent to boundaries.<br />

As approved and as built comparison<br />

<strong>11</strong>/01704/F Development Control Board<br />

25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />

<strong>11</strong>4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!