07.01.2013 Views

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conservation (Natural Habitats &c) Regulations 1994, as amended (the ‘Habitats<br />

Regulations’) which provide for the legal protection <strong>of</strong> European sites. The wintering<br />

population <strong>of</strong> pink footed geese is an interest feature <strong>of</strong> these sites, and this species; Pink<br />

Footed Geese, is known to forage on surrounding arable farmland. Therefore, the location <strong>of</strong><br />

the proposal in relation to these European sites and the results <strong>of</strong> the Collision Risk Model<br />

mean that the application must be determined in accordance with the requirements <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Habitats Regulations.<br />

Natural England (NE) has considered the potential effects <strong>of</strong> the proposal specifically in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> breeding and over-wintering birds - Stone Curlew, Montagus Harrier, Marsh Harrier<br />

and Pink Footed Geese.<br />

The mitigation proposed by RES is detailed within a draft unilateral undertaking. The<br />

mitigation includes the provision <strong>of</strong> a refuge area (agricultural land that is, or has reasonable<br />

potential to be frequently used by pink-footed geese). The fields within the refuge shall<br />

satisfy the following criteria:<br />

� Be within the Qualifying Area;<br />

� Be Sugar beet fields that will be harvested within the Goose Wintering Season;<br />

� Each be <strong>of</strong> at least ten hectares in size, and one area <strong>of</strong> land (whether comprised <strong>of</strong><br />

one or more parcels <strong>of</strong> land) should be a minimum <strong>of</strong> twenty hectares in size; and<br />

� Not be located adjacent to main A roads.<br />

The developer shall evidence to the Monitoring Group that the refuge has been managed as<br />

above for a period <strong>of</strong> 30 days.<br />

Notwithstanding the above the refuge may consist <strong>of</strong> an area(s) totalling more than 72<br />

hectares over a shorter period than 30 days; the number <strong>of</strong> hectares managed multiplies by<br />

the number <strong>of</strong> days the area(s) is managed is at least 2160. If the figure is less than 2160<br />

the Monitoring Group shall be entitled to withdraw the mitigation proportion sum (formula<br />

provided) from the mitigation fund (£<strong>11</strong>0,000). The developer has 60 days in which to pay<br />

money back into the mitigation fund to return the balance to the original level.<br />

If the developer is unable to provide the refuge because the proprietor(s) <strong>of</strong> the area(s) <strong>of</strong><br />

land within the qualifying area are unwilling to enter into an agreement with the developer,<br />

the developer shall supply evidence to the Monitoring Group <strong>of</strong> its <strong>of</strong>fer(s) <strong>of</strong> appropriate<br />

financial compensation (£8.24 for each day that a hectare is to be managed RPI index<br />

linked; formula given) to all relevant registered proprietor(s) <strong>of</strong> the land identified by the<br />

developer.<br />

Prior to the commencement <strong>of</strong> development the developer shall submit the proposed refuge<br />

management scheme for the refuge for the <strong>Council</strong>’s approval; copies to also be provided to<br />

the RSPB and NE. This would need to be approved by the <strong>Council</strong>, if no response is<br />

received within 6 weeks the refuge management scheme shall be deemed to be approved.<br />

Each December the developer shall invite the <strong>Council</strong>, RSPB, NE and NWT to inspect the<br />

refuge and invite comments on the establishment <strong>of</strong> the refuge and implementation <strong>of</strong> the<br />

refuge management scheme. If the <strong>Council</strong> do not inspect the refuge within 10 days <strong>of</strong> the<br />

receipt <strong>of</strong> any request the developer will have no further obligation to request inspection and<br />

it shall be deemed satisfactory.<br />

If however the <strong>Council</strong> chooses to inspect the refuge at any time and requests the developer<br />

undertake any actions reasonably required to comply with the refuge management scheme<br />

then the developer shall comply with the <strong>Council</strong>’s request as soon as reasonably<br />

practicable.<br />

10/01419/FM Development Control Board<br />

25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />

57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!