11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
� To avoid occupation by permanent households which would in turn put pressure<br />
upon local services. Permanent households may place demands for local schools<br />
and social and health services that would not normally arise from visitors. Moreover,<br />
in remote locations the cost <strong>of</strong> providing these services is greater. It may therefore be<br />
reasonable for the planning authority to place an occupancy condition when<br />
properties are being built or converted for residential use; and<br />
� To strengthen tourism in a particular area by ensuring that there is a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />
properties available to encourage visitors to come there on holiday.<br />
It states that planning authorities will frame these conditions according to local<br />
circumstances and that they should be ‘reasonable and fair’. The guide gives an example <strong>of</strong><br />
occupancy conditions applied elsewhere in the country, these read as follows:-<br />
� The caravans (or cabins/chalets) are occupied for holiday purposes only;<br />
� The caravans (or cabins/chalets) shall not be occupied as a person’s sole, or main<br />
place <strong>of</strong> residence;<br />
� The owners/operators shall maintain an up-to-date register <strong>of</strong> the names <strong>of</strong> all<br />
owners/occupiers <strong>of</strong> individual caravans/log cabins/chalets on the site, and <strong>of</strong> their<br />
main home addresses, and shall make this information available at all reasonable<br />
times to the local planning authority.<br />
The current wording <strong>of</strong> condition 32 states that ‘The development shall only be used as<br />
holiday accommodation and shall not be used as a permanent residence at any time’. The<br />
reason being that ‘The site lies within an area in which the Local Planning Authority would<br />
not normally permit permanent residential development’. From this wording, it is the first <strong>of</strong><br />
the bullet points in the practice guide that is relevant to this condition, i.e. to ensure that<br />
policies on development in the countryside are not compromised.<br />
The applicant proposes removing condition 32 as worded and replacing it with 3 conditions<br />
as follows:-<br />
“The residential units hereby approved shall not be the sole residence owned by the<br />
occupier”<br />
“Searles shall maintain an up to-date register <strong>of</strong> the names <strong>of</strong> all owners <strong>of</strong> the residential<br />
units on the site and <strong>of</strong> the other property owned and shall make this information available at<br />
all reasonable times to the local planning authority”<br />
“The owner <strong>of</strong> any residential until hereby approved shall throughout their period <strong>of</strong><br />
ownership:-<br />
� Be a member <strong>of</strong> Heacham Manor Golf Club<br />
� Be a member <strong>of</strong> Searles Resort Club<br />
� Contribute a fair proportion for all services and communal facilities provided by the<br />
resort and used in conjunction with the residential unit”<br />
The applicant acknowledges that the conditions neither refer to holiday accommodation nor<br />
to the units not being used as a permanent place <strong>of</strong> residence. The last <strong>of</strong> the three<br />
proposed conditions would also tie the occupier into the facilities provided at the complex.<br />
<strong>11</strong>/00302/F Development Control Board<br />
25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />
105