07.01.2013 Views

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

� To avoid occupation by permanent households which would in turn put pressure<br />

upon local services. Permanent households may place demands for local schools<br />

and social and health services that would not normally arise from visitors. Moreover,<br />

in remote locations the cost <strong>of</strong> providing these services is greater. It may therefore be<br />

reasonable for the planning authority to place an occupancy condition when<br />

properties are being built or converted for residential use; and<br />

� To strengthen tourism in a particular area by ensuring that there is a wide range <strong>of</strong><br />

properties available to encourage visitors to come there on holiday.<br />

It states that planning authorities will frame these conditions according to local<br />

circumstances and that they should be ‘reasonable and fair’. The guide gives an example <strong>of</strong><br />

occupancy conditions applied elsewhere in the country, these read as follows:-<br />

� The caravans (or cabins/chalets) are occupied for holiday purposes only;<br />

� The caravans (or cabins/chalets) shall not be occupied as a person’s sole, or main<br />

place <strong>of</strong> residence;<br />

� The owners/operators shall maintain an up-to-date register <strong>of</strong> the names <strong>of</strong> all<br />

owners/occupiers <strong>of</strong> individual caravans/log cabins/chalets on the site, and <strong>of</strong> their<br />

main home addresses, and shall make this information available at all reasonable<br />

times to the local planning authority.<br />

The current wording <strong>of</strong> condition 32 states that ‘The development shall only be used as<br />

holiday accommodation and shall not be used as a permanent residence at any time’. The<br />

reason being that ‘The site lies within an area in which the Local Planning Authority would<br />

not normally permit permanent residential development’. From this wording, it is the first <strong>of</strong><br />

the bullet points in the practice guide that is relevant to this condition, i.e. to ensure that<br />

policies on development in the countryside are not compromised.<br />

The applicant proposes removing condition 32 as worded and replacing it with 3 conditions<br />

as follows:-<br />

“The residential units hereby approved shall not be the sole residence owned by the<br />

occupier”<br />

“Searles shall maintain an up to-date register <strong>of</strong> the names <strong>of</strong> all owners <strong>of</strong> the residential<br />

units on the site and <strong>of</strong> the other property owned and shall make this information available at<br />

all reasonable times to the local planning authority”<br />

“The owner <strong>of</strong> any residential until hereby approved shall throughout their period <strong>of</strong><br />

ownership:-<br />

� Be a member <strong>of</strong> Heacham Manor Golf Club<br />

� Be a member <strong>of</strong> Searles Resort Club<br />

� Contribute a fair proportion for all services and communal facilities provided by the<br />

resort and used in conjunction with the residential unit”<br />

The applicant acknowledges that the conditions neither refer to holiday accommodation nor<br />

to the units not being used as a permanent place <strong>of</strong> residence. The last <strong>of</strong> the three<br />

proposed conditions would also tie the occupier into the facilities provided at the complex.<br />

<strong>11</strong>/00302/F Development Control Board<br />

25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!