07.01.2013 Views

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The latter will be formed <strong>of</strong> unbound compacted stone. It is the intention to provide a number<br />

<strong>of</strong> passing places, all <strong>of</strong> which has been subject <strong>of</strong> and passed a safety audit. It is noted that<br />

they will have a significant impact upon the environment <strong>of</strong> the highway corridor.<br />

<strong>Norfolk</strong> County <strong>Council</strong> - Public Rights <strong>of</strong> Way: Bagthorpe with Barmer Restricted Byway<br />

Number 1 is coincident with part <strong>of</strong> the access route to the site and make the following<br />

points:<br />

� Restricted Byways give the public a right <strong>of</strong> way on foot, riding or leading a horse,<br />

and with non-mechanically propelled vehicles. There is no public right to drive a<br />

motor vehicle on a restricted byway. This is separate to any private rights that may<br />

exist.<br />

� It must be ensured that each turbine has a minimum separation distance <strong>of</strong> turbine<br />

‘fall down height’ (including blades) from any public right <strong>of</strong> way<br />

� It is welcomed that alternative routes for the public are proposed to be provided and<br />

maintained adjacent to access tracks, registered public rights <strong>of</strong> way must remain<br />

open, safe and available for public use at all times, even during the construction<br />

period- should this not be the case a temporary closure should be sought.<br />

� If the surface <strong>of</strong> any public right <strong>of</strong> way is damaged during the course <strong>of</strong> any works, it<br />

must be repaired.<br />

� Although Jack’s Lane is not a recorded public right <strong>of</strong> way, it is likely that some form<br />

<strong>of</strong> unregistered rights do exist- suggested that the above conditions relate to Jacks<br />

Lane whilst this is investigated.<br />

Campaign to Protect Rural England: OBJECT the applicant has not produced a separate<br />

Cumulative Impact Assessment but used the 1-12 turbine capacity criteria to include the<br />

Chiplow Wind Farm in their assessment. The site and environs are in a designated Area <strong>of</strong><br />

Important Landscape Quality ‘confined’ which is a material planning consideration. The<br />

North <strong>Norfolk</strong> Heritage Coast and AONB are only about 4kn from the proposed site- there is<br />

potential for significant visual and landscape effects. Heritage assets will be significantly<br />

affected by the presence <strong>of</strong> the development in this landscape. The proposal will be in<br />

conflict with the key characteristics and valued attributes <strong>of</strong> the landscape as clearly set out<br />

in the Landscape Character Assessment- acknowledged in the Land Use Consultants’ (LUC)<br />

Report on Wind Turbine Development (2003). There will be significant visual effects on<br />

residents living in the surrounding villages, as well as negative effects from flicker and noise.<br />

There is little scope to mitigate the visual impact. It is suggested that a Cumulative Impact<br />

Assessment <strong>of</strong> all the permitted and planned wind farms within the 25km-30km radius <strong>of</strong> the<br />

site.<br />

Open Spaces Society: OBJECTION Jack’s Lane is clearly a public highway and this should<br />

be borne in mind when determining this application. The proposed development due to its<br />

size and scale would create a severe intrusion into the character and appearance <strong>of</strong> this<br />

unspoilt landscape. Current dominant features are church/agricultural buildings, villages,<br />

trees. Lights on the structure would also represent a visual intrusion. Concern is also<br />

expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> noise; the cumulative impact with the Chiplow application, field<br />

boundaries, and the proposal fails to adhere to the <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Landscape<br />

Assessment, safety concerns and impact upon over-wintering Pink Footed Geese.<br />

Environment Agency: NO OBJECTION initially a condition was recommended in relation<br />

to drainage details, however clarification was made that the access tracks will be<br />

constructed using crushed stone; the tracks will therefore be permeable and will replicate the<br />

existing greenfield surface water conditions. Therefore we have no concerns regarding the<br />

proposed surface water drainage and a condition is not considered necessary.<br />

10/01419/FM Development Control Board<br />

25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!