11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The latter will be formed <strong>of</strong> unbound compacted stone. It is the intention to provide a number<br />
<strong>of</strong> passing places, all <strong>of</strong> which has been subject <strong>of</strong> and passed a safety audit. It is noted that<br />
they will have a significant impact upon the environment <strong>of</strong> the highway corridor.<br />
<strong>Norfolk</strong> County <strong>Council</strong> - Public Rights <strong>of</strong> Way: Bagthorpe with Barmer Restricted Byway<br />
Number 1 is coincident with part <strong>of</strong> the access route to the site and make the following<br />
points:<br />
� Restricted Byways give the public a right <strong>of</strong> way on foot, riding or leading a horse,<br />
and with non-mechanically propelled vehicles. There is no public right to drive a<br />
motor vehicle on a restricted byway. This is separate to any private rights that may<br />
exist.<br />
� It must be ensured that each turbine has a minimum separation distance <strong>of</strong> turbine<br />
‘fall down height’ (including blades) from any public right <strong>of</strong> way<br />
� It is welcomed that alternative routes for the public are proposed to be provided and<br />
maintained adjacent to access tracks, registered public rights <strong>of</strong> way must remain<br />
open, safe and available for public use at all times, even during the construction<br />
period- should this not be the case a temporary closure should be sought.<br />
� If the surface <strong>of</strong> any public right <strong>of</strong> way is damaged during the course <strong>of</strong> any works, it<br />
must be repaired.<br />
� Although Jack’s Lane is not a recorded public right <strong>of</strong> way, it is likely that some form<br />
<strong>of</strong> unregistered rights do exist- suggested that the above conditions relate to Jacks<br />
Lane whilst this is investigated.<br />
Campaign to Protect Rural England: OBJECT the applicant has not produced a separate<br />
Cumulative Impact Assessment but used the 1-12 turbine capacity criteria to include the<br />
Chiplow Wind Farm in their assessment. The site and environs are in a designated Area <strong>of</strong><br />
Important Landscape Quality ‘confined’ which is a material planning consideration. The<br />
North <strong>Norfolk</strong> Heritage Coast and AONB are only about 4kn from the proposed site- there is<br />
potential for significant visual and landscape effects. Heritage assets will be significantly<br />
affected by the presence <strong>of</strong> the development in this landscape. The proposal will be in<br />
conflict with the key characteristics and valued attributes <strong>of</strong> the landscape as clearly set out<br />
in the Landscape Character Assessment- acknowledged in the Land Use Consultants’ (LUC)<br />
Report on Wind Turbine Development (2003). There will be significant visual effects on<br />
residents living in the surrounding villages, as well as negative effects from flicker and noise.<br />
There is little scope to mitigate the visual impact. It is suggested that a Cumulative Impact<br />
Assessment <strong>of</strong> all the permitted and planned wind farms within the 25km-30km radius <strong>of</strong> the<br />
site.<br />
Open Spaces Society: OBJECTION Jack’s Lane is clearly a public highway and this should<br />
be borne in mind when determining this application. The proposed development due to its<br />
size and scale would create a severe intrusion into the character and appearance <strong>of</strong> this<br />
unspoilt landscape. Current dominant features are church/agricultural buildings, villages,<br />
trees. Lights on the structure would also represent a visual intrusion. Concern is also<br />
expressed in terms <strong>of</strong> noise; the cumulative impact with the Chiplow application, field<br />
boundaries, and the proposal fails to adhere to the <strong>Borough</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Landscape<br />
Assessment, safety concerns and impact upon over-wintering Pink Footed Geese.<br />
Environment Agency: NO OBJECTION initially a condition was recommended in relation<br />
to drainage details, however clarification was made that the access tracks will be<br />
constructed using crushed stone; the tracks will therefore be permeable and will replicate the<br />
existing greenfield surface water conditions. Therefore we have no concerns regarding the<br />
proposed surface water drainage and a condition is not considered necessary.<br />
10/01419/FM Development Control Board<br />
25 July 20<strong>11</strong><br />
46