11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

More documents

Recommendations

Info

EAST OF ENGLAND PLAN Policy SS1: Achieving Sustainable Development - The strategy seeks to bring about sustainable development by applying the guiding principles of the UK Sustainable Development Strategy 2005, the elements contributing to the creation of sustainable communities described in Sustainable Communities: Homes for All: Policy ENV6: The Historic Environment - Local planning authorities should identify, protect, conserve and, where appropriate, enhance the historic environment of the region, its archaeology, historic buildings, places and landscapes, including historic parks and gardens and those features and sites (and their settings) especially significant in the East of England. Policy ENV7: Quality in the Built Environment - Local Development Documents should require new development to be of high quality which complements the distinctive character and best qualities of the local area and promotes urban renaissance and regeneration. Policy WAT4: Flood Risk Management - States that the priorities are to defend existing properties from flooding and locate new development where there is little or no risk of flooding. PLANNING POLICIES The Norfolk Structure Plan (1999) contains the following policies that are relevant to this application: T.2 - requires that the traffic implications of new development are assessed. The King’s Lynn and West Norfolk Local Plan (1998) contains the following saved policies that are relevant to the proposal: 4/21 - indicates that in built-up areas of towns or villages identified on the Proposals Map as Built Environment Type C or D development will be permitted where it is in character with the locality. LDF CORE STRATEGY POLICIES CS03 - King's Lynn Area PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS A short explanation regarding recent changes to HMO legislation is considered useful in this case. Background to HMO legislation In 2010 changes to legislation took place concerning the control of HMOs. The previous government felt that the concentration of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) can result in unintended consequences that can create friction with the local community and can also lead to both positive and negative effects upon a local housing market area including social, economic, as well as environmental and physical impacts. 11/00732/CU Development Control Board 25 July 2011 124
Particular concern had been raised about the impact of HMOs occupied by students. These concerns focus around the creation of summer 'ghost towns', increased noise, litter, pressure on car parking and anti-social behaviour. The changes in legislation were intended to allow local authorities greater control over the unwanted effects of HMOs where there are problems by increasing the number of new HMOs which require planning permission allowing local authorities the opportunity to consider the impacts of such proposals. However, whilst the negative impact of houses in multiple occupation (HMOs) can cause concern, they can also make an important contribution to the private rented sector by providing housing to meet the needs of specific groups/households and by making a contribution to the overall provision of affordable housing stock. In response to these issues the previous government brought in The Town and Country Planning (Use Classes) (Amendment) (England) Order 2010 SI 2010 No. 653 which created a new, separate use class for HMOs. Class C4 was created which defined ‘houses in multiple occupation’ as the use of a dwellinghouse by not more than six residents as a ‘house in multiple occupation’. The meaning of a HMO is defined in Section 254 of the Housing Act 2004. This came into force on 6 April 2010. However, the new Government felt that some of these measures were too stringent, and subsequently introduced the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (Amendment) (No.2) (England) Order 2010 SI No. 2134, which came into force on 1st October 2010. This permits the change of use from a use falling within Class C3 (dwellinghouses) to a use falling within Class C4 (houses in multiple occupation) or from Class C4 to Class C3. Class C3 allows for not more than six residents living together as a single household (with or without provided care). Class C4 allows for the use of a dwellinghouse by not more than six residents as a house in multiple occupation. The key difference being that occupants of the building are unrelated but share basic amenities in living accommodation. A fuller definition is set out in Section 254 of the Housing Act 2004. This revised development order effectively allows as permitted development certain sizes of HMO’s. As this proposal is for one more than the threshold of 6, permission is required. The key issues identified in the consideration of this application are as follows: � Principle of development � Highway implications � Residential Amenity, noise and anti-social behaviour � Impact on Conservation Area � Other material considerations Principle of development The existing property is a large, Edwardian, corner property which currently has five bedrooms, a living room, a dining room, a study, two kitchens and two bathrooms. There are also facilities for three vehicles to be parked within the site. Currently, under permitted development rights the property can convert from a C3 dwellinghouse to a HMO for up to six people without the need to apply for planning permission. 11/00732/CU Development Control Board 25 July 2011 125
Page 1 and 2:
DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD AGENDA Mo
Page 3 and 4:
King’s Court, Chapel Street, King
Page 5 and 6:
11 PLANNING ENFORCEMENT - LAND AT 8
Page 7 and 8:
Item No. Application No. Location a
Page 9 and 10:
11/01064/CM Land at The Willows Bus
Page 11 and 12:
THE APPLICATION The site The site i
Page 13 and 14:
SUPPORTING CASE The following is ta
Page 15 and 16:
PLANNING HISTORY Willows Business P
Page 17 and 18:
� Combined emissions from other p
Page 19 and 20:
BCKLWN Environmental Health - Commu
Page 21 and 22:
Within 28 days from the receipt of
Page 23 and 24:
REPRESENTATIONS No separate consult
Page 25 and 26:
SAVED POLICIES OF THE NORFOLK WASTE
Page 27 and 28:
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS The applica
Page 29 and 30:
For reasons referred to above and a
Page 31 and 32:
Involvement of the County Council i
Page 33 and 34:
The table below shows the scoring f
Page 35 and 36:
Energy Utilisation There does appea
Page 37 and 38:
The highest scoring site, if the sc
Page 39 and 40:
It will be down to Norfolk County C
Page 41 and 42:
However, the assessment concentrate
Page 43 and 44:
5) Reason The information presented
Page 45 and 46:
10/01419/FM Barwick Hall Farm Barwi
Page 47 and 48:
Recommendation REFUSE THE APPLICATI
Page 49 and 50:
hardstanding areas at the turbine l
Page 51 and 52:
esidents had there windows open- th
Page 53 and 54:
Norfolk Wildlife Trust: OBJECT Avoi
Page 55 and 56:
Environmental Health & Housing - En
Page 57 and 58:
NATIONAL GUIDANCE PPS1 - “Deliver
Page 59 and 60:
POLICY CONTEXT PPS22 ‘Renewable E
Page 61 and 62:
ased on 3-bladed turbines with a to
Page 63 and 64:
� The typical height of wind turb
Page 65 and 66:
Conservation (Natural Habitats &c)
Page 67 and 68:
In this case, the proposal is not d
Page 69 and 70:
With regard to Bloodgate Hill Fort,
Page 71 and 72:
It has been recognised by the Plann
Page 73 and 74:
the vast majority of the land conta
Page 75 and 76:
Planning Authorities should ensure
Page 77 and 78:
Parish: Denver AGENDA ITEM NO: 8/3(
Page 79 and 80:
� Members should visit the site b
Page 81 and 82: Trees and Landscape The proposed ex
Page 83 and 84: 11/00950/F Lime House The Green Eas
Page 85 and 86: end of the property include an arch
Page 87 and 88: PLANNING HISTORY 11/00951/LB LISTED
Page 89 and 90: Impact upon Listed Buildings and Co
Page 91 and 92: designed in such a way as to minimi
Page 93 and 94: (iii) an appraisal of remedial opti
Page 95 and 96: 12 Condition There are some hard su
Page 97 and 98: 11/00951/LB Lime House The Green Ea
Page 99 and 100: an off-set carriage arch with board
Page 101 and 102: goes with the change of use from sh
Page 103 and 104: The PPS5 defines conservation as th
Page 105 and 106: Proposed Typical Carts Shed Plans _
Page 107 and 108: 11/00302/F Heacham Manor Hotel Huns
Page 109 and 110: such units in new buildings laid ou
Page 111 and 112: PPS4: Planning for Sustainable Econ
Page 113 and 114: � To avoid occupation by permanen
Page 115 and 116: 1 Reason To comply with Section 91
Page 117 and 118: 14 Condition All hard and soft land
Page 119 and 120: 24 Condition The bars and restauran
Page 121 and 122: Parish: Hockwold cum Wilton AGENDA
Page 123 and 124: The comparison between siting arran
Page 125 and 126: Given the extant 2003 approval, the
Page 127 and 128: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to
Page 129 and 130: Parish: King's Lynn AGENDA ITEM NO:
Page 131: Environment Agency: No objection -
Page 135 and 136: Generally speaking residents of HMO
Page 137 and 138: RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE subject to
Page 139 and 140: Parish: Ringstead AGENDA ITEM NO: 8
Page 141 and 142: e outside the current ‘built’ e
Page 143 and 144: detached, two storey dwelling with
Page 145 and 146: 3 Condition Prior to the commenceme
Page 147 and 148: 11/00881/F The Old Smithy Church La
Page 149 and 150: Previously planning permission was
Page 151 and 152: REPRESENTATIONS No third party comm
Page 153 and 154: The proposed extension can be achie
Page 155 and 156: The proposed development is conside
Page 157 and 158: 10 Reason To ensure that risks from
Page 159 and 160: 11/00812/O The Beeches 122 Grimston
Page 161 and 162: SUPPORTING CASE The application is
Page 163 and 164: PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS Principle o
Page 165 and 166: 4 Reason To ensure satisfactory lan
Page 167 and 168: Parish: Upwell AGENDA ITEM NO: 8/3(
Page 169 and 170: Environment Agency: No Comment Inte
Page 171 and 172: The applicants’ agent addresses t
Page 173 and 174: The Sale Full details of the sale p
Page 175 and 176: AGENDA ITEM: 9 167 DEVELOPMENT CONT
Page 177 and 178: 169 Brancaster 11/00514/F Mr S Glyn
Page 179 and 180: 171 Dersingham 11/00744/O Mrs Angel
Page 181 and 182: 173 Hilgay 11/00612/F Mr & Mrs Gilb
Page 183 and 184:
175 King's Lynn 11/00747/CU College
Page 185 and 186:
177 Middleton 27.05.2011 24.06.2011
Page 187 and 188:
179 Snettisham 11/00539/F Mr & Mrs
Page 189 and 190:
181 Thornham 11/00455/NMA_1 Mr A Mo
Page 191 and 192:
183 West Rudham 11/00741/F Client o
Page 193 and 194:
De minimis 2 Delegated Authority -
Page 195 and 196:
187 Installation of upvc windows in
Page 197 and 198:
189 Unauthorised change of use of l
Page 199 and 200:
191 Pending Consideration Alleged u
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
195 DC Application Submitted allege
Page 205 and 206:
197 Pending Consideration Unauthori
Page 207 and 208:
199 Pending Consideration Alleged r
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
203 Pending Consideration School Ho
Page 213 and 214:
205 Pending Consideration One Acre
Page 215 and 216:
207 Pending Consideration alleged b
Page 217 and 218:
209 Alleged breach of planning perm
Page 219 and 220:
211 Pending Consideration KC 2000 L
Page 221 and 222:
213 Pending Consideration alleged u
Page 223 and 224:
215 Pending Consideration alleged b
Page 225 and 226:
217 5 Magdalen Road Tilney St Lawre
Page 227 and 228:
219 alleged breach of conditions re
Page 229 and 230:
221 DC Application Submitted allege
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
225 Pending Consideration Condition
Page 235 and 236:
227 DEVELOPMENT CONTROL BOARD AGEND
Page 237 and 238:
4.0 PLANNING HISTORY 10/00200/F - S
Page 239 and 240:
231 for Gypsy & Travellers. The par
Page 241 and 242:
maximum fine on summary conviction
Page 243 and 244:
12.5 It is also of note that direct
Page 245 and 246:
237
Page 247 and 248:
239
show all

11/00713/F - Borough Council of King's Lynn & West Norfolk

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?