12.01.2013 Views

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OOPS 112<br />

worn one before, and some had only seen <strong>the</strong>m on TV. As <strong>the</strong>y quickly<br />

discovered, disposable fashion wasn’t necessarily very comfortable. “They<br />

didn’t move well, <strong>the</strong>y were uncomfortable when you wore <strong>the</strong>m, and <strong>the</strong>y<br />

billowed out when you sat down,” Ellen Shanley, curator <strong>of</strong> costumes at<br />

<strong>the</strong> Fashion Institute <strong>of</strong> Technology Museum, told Newsday in 1999. And<br />

as our newspaperwoman in Kansas discovered, <strong>the</strong>y also were prone to<br />

sudden disintegration. Consumer Reports derided <strong>the</strong> original Scott Paper<br />

Caper dress’s quality, noting that it “is ra<strong>the</strong>r sloppily made; <strong>the</strong> ‘fabric’ is<br />

not very strong; and <strong>the</strong> printed color has a tendency to rub <strong>of</strong>f when it<br />

gets damp.”<br />

Paper dress wearers also <strong>of</strong>ten found <strong>the</strong>mselves feeling nervous at<br />

parties, out <strong>of</strong> fear that a chance encounter with a Benson & Hedges 100<br />

could turn <strong>the</strong>m into a fashionista flambé. The Los Angeles City Fire Department<br />

briefly banned <strong>the</strong> sale <strong>of</strong> paper dresses in late 1966, until a department<br />

chemist determined that <strong>the</strong>y were no more fl ammable than<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r garments. In truth, paper dresses were probably safer than cotton or<br />

nylon, since most were treated with a fl ame-retardant fi nish.<br />

But <strong>the</strong>re was a catch. As <strong>the</strong> chief <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. Public Health Service’s<br />

injury-control program warned in a newspaper interview, <strong>the</strong> fl ameretardant<br />

chemicals were rendered ineffec tive if <strong>the</strong> garment was washed<br />

or dry-cleaned. To be on <strong>the</strong> safe side, paper dresses could be worn only<br />

once—unless, perhaps, <strong>the</strong> wearer had <strong>the</strong> same bli<strong>the</strong> disregard for personal<br />

hygiene that she had for sartorial convention. Life discovered that<br />

limitation when it tested paper dresses’ durability by somehow convincing<br />

a woman to wear one every day for a month while she did housework.<br />

Though <strong>the</strong> fabric didn’t shred, she complained afterward that “I like a<br />

dress I can wash.”<br />

As those drawbacks started to sink in, sales <strong>of</strong> paper dresses plummeted<br />

as quickly as <strong>the</strong>y had risen. In a sense, <strong>the</strong> paper dress was a victim<br />

<strong>of</strong> its own success. As fashion writer Angela Taylor noted in 1969, <strong>the</strong> garment<br />

became popular so quickly that companies, in <strong>the</strong>ir rush to meet <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!