12.01.2013 Views

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

READ THE FINE PRINT 9<br />

ners, or who was branded a “leaker” for going over <strong>the</strong> falls, might be<br />

placed in <strong>the</strong> same sexual purgatory as <strong>the</strong> community’s young boys, with<br />

sexual access restricted only to <strong>the</strong> community’s older women, or denied<br />

altoge<strong>the</strong>r. If you wanted to play at Oneida, you played by Noyes’s rules.<br />

“Love at Oneida was not ‘free,’ ” wrote Kern, “and those who confused<br />

complex marriage with free love erred gravely in <strong>the</strong>ir conception.”<br />

As a result, <strong>the</strong> Oneida Community was a roiling stew <strong>of</strong> weirdness.<br />

Noyes and his followers willfully violated every conceivable sexual<br />

taboo, from <strong>the</strong> routine deflowering <strong>of</strong> preteen girls by <strong>the</strong> community’s<br />

older men, to institutionalized incest, to eugenics. To manage so complicated<br />

a social structure, <strong>the</strong> Oneida Community had a rule book that,<br />

were it not evolving constantly in Noyes’s head, might have been as dense<br />

as <strong>the</strong> modern U.S. tax code, and just as bizarre. And in Noyes, <strong>the</strong> Perfectionists<br />

had an autocratic leader who oversaw <strong>the</strong> most intimate details<br />

<strong>of</strong> his followers’ lives with <strong>the</strong> same attention to detail that Hugh Hefner<br />

once brought to Playmate photo shoots.<br />

“This was rational sex, one might say, with a vengeance,” wrote<br />

editor Kaz Dziamka in <strong>the</strong> journal American Rationalist. “No o<strong>the</strong>r utopian<br />

experiment before or since has so drastically overhauled <strong>the</strong> existing<br />

system <strong>of</strong> sexual, moral and social conventions. . . . One would expect<br />

that <strong>the</strong> system would never work, that human nature being what it is, no<br />

sensible woman or man would ever be glad to share sexually his lover [and<br />

that] any utopia based on Male Continence, Complex Marriage and Christian<br />

Perfectionism would be doomed to fail from <strong>the</strong> start. But <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

uncomfortable fact is that <strong>the</strong> Oneida Community did succeed.”<br />

For a while.<br />

As with any organization built around a charismatic leader, <strong>the</strong><br />

Oneida Community began to unravel during <strong>the</strong> 1860s as Noyes’s powers<br />

began to fade. He stayed at Oneida less and less, and started delegating<br />

responsibilities to o<strong>the</strong>rs in his inner circle, including <strong>the</strong> initiation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

community’s virgins. (For much <strong>of</strong> his life at Oneida, Noyes had reserved

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!