12.01.2013 Views

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KNOW “HELPFUL” FROM “ANNOYING” 191<br />

in uninvited, <strong>of</strong>fering advice that was <strong>of</strong>ten useless, and refusing to leave<br />

quickly actually made him less anthropomorphic. They concluded: “If<br />

this behavior were that <strong>of</strong> a human <strong>of</strong>fice assistant, <strong>the</strong>n he would eventually<br />

be fired, or at least severely marginalized.”<br />

The unfortunate paper clip did become a trendsetter—though not<br />

<strong>the</strong> sort Micros<strong>of</strong>t had intended. Clippy became a prototype victim <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sort <strong>of</strong> Internet-speed savaging later directed at politicians and movie<br />

starlets. ZDNet.com, <strong>the</strong> computer news site, <strong>of</strong>fered a tutorial on how to<br />

eradicate Clippy, and people who posted to Internet discussion boards<br />

trashed <strong>the</strong> agent. Clippy served as <strong>the</strong> inspiration for a vast number <strong>of</strong><br />

online amateur satirists. One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> funniest created an imitation Clippy,<br />

which <strong>of</strong>fered nonsensical interruptions such as “Your computer seems to<br />

be on” and “It is time to play a game—let’s play hide and seek.” To make<br />

matters worse, ZDNet.com reported in 2000 that a hacker had found a<br />

potential security hole in Clippy that would enable him to attack users’<br />

computers. Micros<strong>of</strong>t quickly issued a security patch, but by <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> revelation<br />

had already added fuel to <strong>the</strong> anti-Clippy confl agration.<br />

“Useless, Obsolete, and . . . Hideously Unattractive”<br />

In April 2001, Micros<strong>of</strong>t exiled Clippy to <strong>the</strong> options selection in its<br />

latest release, Offi ce XP, which had new, improved help features, such as<br />

smart tags and task panes, that Micros<strong>of</strong>t said made <strong>the</strong> assistant unneeded.<br />

But Clippy had been so gratingly conspicuous on millions <strong>of</strong> computer<br />

screens that Micros<strong>of</strong>t could hardly just abandon it quietly, <strong>the</strong> way<br />

that Ford had tried to slip <strong>the</strong> Edsel’s cancellation into an obscure fi nancial<br />

report in 1959. Paradoxically, though Clippy’s purpose had been to<br />

make Micros<strong>of</strong>t Offi ce simpler to use, New York Times computing writer<br />

John Mark<strong>of</strong>f observed that <strong>the</strong> annoying paper clip had come to exemplify<br />

<strong>the</strong> s<strong>of</strong>tware giant’s overburdening <strong>of</strong> users with too many features.<br />

So instead, Micros<strong>of</strong>t opted for one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most bizarre—yet<br />

successful—promotional gambits in history. To hype its new Clippy-free<br />

release <strong>of</strong> Office, it joined disgruntled users <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> old version in ridiculing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!