12.01.2013 Views

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IGNORE THE PAST AT YOUR PERIL 59<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essor probably was <strong>the</strong> last person <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> collapsing bridge.) At 11:02,<br />

a six-hundred-foot-long section <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> center-span roadway broke free,<br />

flipped over, and fell, taking Coatsworth’s car and Tubby, <strong>the</strong> day’s only<br />

casualty, down with it. The splash reached one hundred feet high. By<br />

11:10, Puget Sound had a new thirty-fathom-deep reef that eventually<br />

proved so suitable for underwater life that, even after extensive salvage<br />

operations, it was named in 1992 to <strong>the</strong> National Register <strong>of</strong> Historic<br />

Places.<br />

An after-<strong>the</strong>-fact reference to <strong>the</strong> 1940 Tacoma Narrows Bridge<br />

collapse in <strong>the</strong> collection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> University <strong>of</strong> Washington Libraries refers<br />

to <strong>the</strong> event as “<strong>the</strong> Pearl Harbor <strong>of</strong> engineering,” and in some ways it<br />

was. But in o<strong>the</strong>r ways, <strong>the</strong> catastrophe may have been one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most<br />

constructive events in modern engineering. Petroski, a Duke University<br />

civil engineering pr<strong>of</strong>essor, wrote in 2001 that “unfortunately, it <strong>of</strong>ten<br />

takes a catastrophic failure to provide clear and unambiguous evidence<br />

that <strong>the</strong> design assumptions were faulty. It provided <strong>the</strong> counterexample<br />

to <strong>the</strong> implicit engineering hypo<strong>the</strong>sis under which all such bridges were<br />

designed, namely, that wind did not produce aerodynamic effects in heavy<br />

bridge decks sufficient to bring <strong>the</strong>m down. Thus, <strong>the</strong> failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tacoma<br />

Narrows Bridge proved more instructive than <strong>the</strong> success <strong>of</strong> all <strong>the</strong><br />

bridges that had performed satisfactorily—or nearly so—over <strong>the</strong> preceding<br />

decades.”<br />

Even now, <strong>the</strong> far sturdier and more conventional $14 million replacement<br />

bridge that began carrying traffi c across <strong>the</strong> Tacoma Narrows<br />

in 1950 is “one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> most studied in <strong>the</strong> United States,” engineering<br />

manager Joe Collins told <strong>the</strong> News Tribune in Tacoma in 2002. Its builder,<br />

Tacoma Narrows Constructors, began precautionary tests that year to<br />

make sure its fi ve-year, $615 million plan to resurface <strong>the</strong> bridge roadway<br />

wouldn’t end up changing <strong>the</strong> behavior <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bridge in <strong>the</strong> wind or under<br />

stress. “The world as a whole got much smarter about suspension bridges<br />

as a result <strong>of</strong> Galloping Gertie’s failure,” Collins said.<br />

The Tacoma Narrows Bridge collapse is still mentioned alongside

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!