12.01.2013 Views

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CULTURAL NORMS RESIST RADICAL CHANGE 169<br />

negatively to <strong>the</strong> new style. In 1976, corporate fashion con sultant Malloy<br />

surveyed forty managers in <strong>of</strong>fices where employees wore leisure suits.<br />

Only one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bosses was wearing a leisure suit himself. A resounding<br />

thirty-four <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> remaining thirty-nine said <strong>the</strong>y would be more likely to<br />

trust an important assignment to a man in a traditional suit. Fourteen said<br />

<strong>the</strong>y would be less likely to promote a man who wore leisure suits. Malloy<br />

found that bosses considered leisure suits acceptable only if <strong>the</strong>y were<br />

made <strong>of</strong> some material o<strong>the</strong>r than polyester, preferably in a solid color. A<br />

few companies—including, <strong>the</strong> New York Times reported, an unnamed<br />

department store that probably sold leisure suits—banned employees<br />

from wearing <strong>the</strong>m at all. (The very name “leisure suit,” which suggested<br />

that <strong>the</strong> garment inspired languor in workers, certainly didn’t help.)<br />

Nobody wanted to commit career suicide in <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> having a<br />

versatile wardrobe, especially in <strong>the</strong> sputtering economy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mid-1970s.<br />

The leisure suit might have survived anyway as sportswear if it had delivered<br />

on <strong>the</strong> “hassle-free” comfort that manufacturer John Pomer touted<br />

in an ad. Instead, membership in <strong>the</strong> fashion avant-garde required putting<br />

up with double-knit polyester’s tendency to trap moisture, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

breathing as natural fibers did. On warm days, a leisure suit doubled as a<br />

portable sauna. “It had an especially bad reputation in Texas and <strong>the</strong><br />

Southwest,” syn<strong>the</strong>tic fabric scientist Dmitry Gagarine told United Press<br />

International in 1983. And <strong>the</strong> material, especially in <strong>the</strong> cheaper suits,<br />

was so stiff that some wearers joked that <strong>the</strong>y could stand <strong>the</strong>ir leisure<br />

suits up in a corner ra<strong>the</strong>r than hanging <strong>the</strong>m in <strong>the</strong> closet. For all its<br />

coarse scratchiness, it wasn’t particularly durable. “The double-knits<br />

were shiny and would snap and snag,” Paul Apostol, director <strong>of</strong> woven<br />

markets for Celanese Fibers, told <strong>the</strong> Wall Street Journal in 1985. “It was<br />

tacky clothing.”<br />

By <strong>the</strong> summer <strong>of</strong> 1976, a little more than two years after <strong>the</strong> leisure<br />

suit had emerged as <strong>the</strong> hottest fad in fashion, it was starting to wane.<br />

In New York, sales slowed so abruptly that retailers were forced to <strong>of</strong>fer<br />

50 percent <strong>of</strong>f on <strong>the</strong>ir inventory. That year, <strong>the</strong> clothing industry sold 6

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!