12.01.2013 Views

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

the abbreviated reign of “neon” leon spinks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CULTURAL NORMS RESIST RADICAL CHANGE 171<br />

ger had formal dress codes, and more than half specifically allowed casual<br />

clo<strong>the</strong>s at <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> change really gave men more sartorial<br />

freedom is questionable, since <strong>the</strong> coat-and-tie requirement <strong>of</strong>ten was replaced<br />

by equally rigid but more complicated guidelines about what sort<br />

<strong>of</strong> casual clo<strong>the</strong>s were acceptable.<br />

As a result, <strong>the</strong> workplace <strong>of</strong>ten became an equally monotonous sea<br />

<strong>of</strong> long- sleeved buttoned-down denim shirts and tan or olive khaki trousers.<br />

Sportswear maker Levi Strauss actually established a toll-free number<br />

for employers who were uncertain about what sort <strong>of</strong> attire <strong>the</strong>y should<br />

allow. Makers <strong>of</strong> traditional suits tried to dismiss <strong>the</strong> business casual look<br />

by derisively comparing it to <strong>the</strong> leisure suit—but eventually came to see<br />

it as an equally grave threat. They tried to deter <strong>the</strong> new style by publicizing<br />

a survey by an employment law firm in which 44 percent <strong>of</strong> companies<br />

saw an increase in lateness and absenteeism after <strong>the</strong>y allowed casual<br />

dress, and 30 percent reported a rise in flirting. (In fairness, <strong>the</strong> same<br />

survey also showed that 40 percent <strong>of</strong> companies reported a rise in productivity<br />

when <strong>the</strong>y went casual.) Never<strong>the</strong>less, as <strong>the</strong> 21st century began,<br />

<strong>the</strong> necktieless world that leisure suit designers had envisioned seemed to<br />

have arrived, albeit in a different form.<br />

Meanwhile, Kim Jong Il continues to champion <strong>the</strong> leisure suit as<br />

determinedly as he’s apparently pursuing development <strong>of</strong> his nuclear missile<br />

arsenal. He’s said to reward <strong>the</strong> designers <strong>of</strong> his wardrobe with imported<br />

luxury automobiles and o<strong>the</strong>r perks when <strong>the</strong>y come up with a new<br />

garment that particularly piques his atavistic sartorial sensibilities. As<br />

fashion critic Jess Cartner- Morley <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> British newspaper <strong>the</strong> Guardian<br />

once noted, sardonically: “No one wears it with quite <strong>the</strong> flair that Kim<br />

does. Look at him: he’s loving <strong>the</strong> camera. He knows he looks hot.”<br />

THE STYLE THAT WON’T DIE<br />

Since <strong>the</strong> leisure suit’s brief but intense popularity in <strong>the</strong> mid-<br />

1970s, designers have periodically tried to revive <strong>the</strong> garment. In 1986,<br />

designer Bill Robinson showed updated versions <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> leisure suit at <strong>the</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!