02.02.2013 Views

3c hapter - Index of

3c hapter - Index of

3c hapter - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Blue Skies, Pipe Dreams, and the Lure <strong>of</strong> Easy Money 23<br />

from federal regulations. It also created an “accredited investor”<br />

category. In addition to insiders and institutional investors, the<br />

defi nition encompassed affl uent individuals who, by dint <strong>of</strong> their<br />

wealth and the fi nancial sophistication that implied, did not<br />

require the protective coddling <strong>of</strong> the SEC. Private companies<br />

were now free to raise money from these well- heeled investors<br />

without going through a costly registration process. 5<br />

Just like that, the universe <strong>of</strong> investors was cleaved in two. If<br />

you had a net worth <strong>of</strong> $1 million or more, or annual income <strong>of</strong> at<br />

least $200,000 (later amended to $300,000 for couples), you were<br />

among the top 2 percent <strong>of</strong> Americans and could invest in pretty<br />

much anything you like. 6 The rest—the vast majority <strong>of</strong> Americans<br />

who failed to meet that standard—were free to buy publicly traded<br />

stocks, bonds, and mutual funds but were effectively barred from<br />

a wide range <strong>of</strong> investment opportunities in small, private ventures<br />

deemed too risky. Hereon, there would be two sets <strong>of</strong> rules<br />

for investing. 7<br />

To use Michael Shuman’s colorful analogy, it was the same<br />

philosophy that led to Prohibition: If you cannot be trusted to<br />

drink responsibly, we will ban drinking. If investors could not be<br />

trusted to invest their money wisely, the SEC would ban them<br />

from risky investments. Happily, reasonable minds prevailed and<br />

Prohibition was repealed in 1933. But we are still left with our<br />

dual- class investor system.<br />

To be fair, it is not an outright ban. The SEC over the years<br />

has carved out exemptions that make it easier for small companies<br />

to raise money from the public without the burdens <strong>of</strong> registration<br />

and ongoing reporting requirements. But there is an Alice<br />

in Wonderland- like madness to the rules, which inspire as many<br />

interpretations as there are legal experts. Reg D contains three<br />

different exemptions for small <strong>of</strong>ferings <strong>of</strong> under $1 million or<br />

$5 million. But two <strong>of</strong> them (Rules 505 and 506) limit the number<br />

<strong>of</strong> nonaccredited investors to 35, and those folks must be supplied<br />

with similar documentation and disclosure as would be required<br />

in a registered <strong>of</strong>fering, so many companies stick to accredited<br />

investors to simplify matters. There are also prohibitions<br />

on soliciting the general public (as Dante Hesse did when he

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!