02.02.2013 Views

3c hapter - Index of

3c hapter - Index of

3c hapter - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

56 Locavesting<br />

and political organizations. Commercial banks alone spent more<br />

than $50 million in lobbying that year, and interested parties such<br />

as Goldman Sachs, Visa, and the Private Equity Council fi elded<br />

lobbying teams stuffed with ex- government <strong>of</strong>fi cials. 21 And even<br />

as they publicly made nice, the largest health- care organizations<br />

spent more than a half- billion dollars to infl uence landmark<br />

health- care legislation. The Chamber <strong>of</strong> Commerce, backed by<br />

some <strong>of</strong> the biggest corporations in the world, spent almost $80<br />

million in just three months in the fall <strong>of</strong> 2009.<br />

Thanks to the controversial Citizens United Supreme Court<br />

decision in July 2010, corporations and special interest groups<br />

can now spend unlimited sums on political advertisements without<br />

ever having to reveal their role. In the 2010 midterm elections,<br />

more than $455 million fl ooded into ads aimed at defeating<br />

or promoting candidates, much <strong>of</strong> it from opaque “grassroots”<br />

groups created after the ruling.<br />

The fi x is in. And what do we get in return? Outsourced jobs<br />

and <strong>of</strong>fshore tax shelters that rob the country <strong>of</strong> revenue.<br />

U.S. corporations raked in record pr<strong>of</strong>i ts in 2010—$1.6 trillion<br />

in the third quarter alone, fueled by massive cost- cutting and lay<strong>of</strong>fs<br />

and the ability to borrow on the cheap. 22 They were also sitting<br />

atop a mountain <strong>of</strong> cash totaling nearly $2 trillion. But that did not<br />

translate into jobs. Recent economic downturns, unlike those <strong>of</strong> the<br />

past, are increasingly followed by jobless recoveries. What’s changed?<br />

The balance <strong>of</strong> power between corporations and their employees,<br />

according to a growing chorus <strong>of</strong> economic observers. Unions have<br />

withered, courts have become friendlier to big business, and “companies<br />

now come closer to setting the terms <strong>of</strong> their relationship with<br />

employees, letting them go when they become a drag on pr<strong>of</strong>i ts and<br />

relying on remaining workers or temporary ones when business picks<br />

up,” writes David Leonhardt in the New York Times.<br />

Desmond Lachman, a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute,<br />

notes, “Corporations are taking advantage <strong>of</strong> slack in the labor<br />

market. They are using that bargaining power to cut benefi ts and<br />

wages, and to shorten hours.” 23 The diminished work conditions<br />

<strong>of</strong> the private sector are now the standard to which public sector<br />

employees—such as teachers and fi refi ghters—are being compared.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!