05.02.2013 Views

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

32 LITERATÛRZINÂTNE, FOLKLORISTIKA, MÂKSLA<br />

the idea of a national church, being part of a national state. Thus serving to the state<br />

simultaneously becomes servinging to the Church, at the same time; this was regarded<br />

as an act of piety. In contemporary Latvia one can find both of these attitudes.<br />

The identity of Latvia as a state in the future will be highly dependent on what<br />

kind of society model the people of Latvia are going to develop. The population of<br />

Latvia has to solve several dilemmas: are non–Latvians able to identify themselves<br />

with the state of Latvia, or do they perceive this country as a temporary homeland<br />

before moving on? The dilemma for Latvians is to grasp the fact that the term “national”<br />

in the modern world has the connotation of “belonging to the state” (not<br />

merely based on ethnic identification) and open their society to the people loyal to<br />

Latvia.<br />

The Russian journalist Alexander Shabanov in his article “The Russians of<br />

Latvia, What Kind of People Are We?” (10,2) has taken a courageous step: he is one<br />

of the first to discuss this problem openly – eleven years after the independence was<br />

restored:<br />

… our society (at least the Russian–speaking people of Latvia) is still<br />

very much Soviet and totalitarian. Though historically, geographically<br />

and with regard to the life–style belonging to the West, people still hesitate<br />

to admit it.<br />

The Russian – speaking people are against the language policy of Latvia<br />

and the introduction of Latvian in the secondary schools in 2004, trying<br />

to explain it by the fear of losing their (ethnic – S.A.) identity. To my<br />

mind this identity is neither Russian nor Slavic, but essentially Soviet, or<br />

totalitarian. There are lots of Russian features in this Soviet attitude and<br />

totalitarianism. But the Soviet Union does not exist anymore, its identity<br />

is about to disappear, and from this emerges the spiritual suffering of the<br />

‘Soviet man’. Yes, the Soviet Union is still alive in Bielorussia and the<br />

Republic of Pridnester. Yes, it does exist in a large part of Latvia. But<br />

for how long?<br />

Why am I describing the mentality of the people living in Latvia as “Soviet”?<br />

I do not want to hurt anybody`s feelings but Soviet is the celebration<br />

of the May 9 th , with the red flags of the Soviet Union at the statue<br />

of Victory, the speeches, songs and the rest of entourage of the Soviet<br />

time. On that day and in that place it seems that nothing has changed in<br />

the last 11 years, and the organizers and participants of this affair promote<br />

this feeling deliberately. It is clear to any objective observer that<br />

this is nostalgia for the USSR, just as the features of despotism in songs<br />

and speeches. sVictory in WWII accounts for the means (as the song “<br />

Mi za cenoj ne postoim” says it. (We are ready to pay any price – transl.<br />

SA). Obviously the victors are not tried.<br />

I understand the necessity to conquer fascism – there was no other way,<br />

and there will be no other way. But the time has come to analyze this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!