15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 - Gas Flow through <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

As in (c), the sudden contraction behaves like a partially closed end, sending back a<br />

partial "echo" <strong>of</strong> the incident pulse. The onward transmitted pressure wave is also one <strong>of</strong><br />

expansion, but it should be noted that it has an increased expansion pressure ratio <strong>of</strong> 0.741.<br />

The theoretical presentation here, due to Benson [2.4], is clearly too simple to be completely<br />

accurate in all circumstances. It is, however, a very good guide as to the magnitude <strong>of</strong><br />

pressure wave reflection <strong>and</strong> transmission. The major objections to its use where accuracy is<br />

required are that the assumption <strong>of</strong> "constant pressure" at the discontinuity in pipe area cannot<br />

possibly be tenable over all flow situations <strong>and</strong> that the thermodynamic assumption is <strong>of</strong><br />

isentropic flow in all circumstances. A more complete theoretical approach is examined in<br />

more detail in the following sections. A full discussion <strong>of</strong> the accuracy <strong>of</strong> such a simple<br />

assumption is illustrated by numeric examples in Sec. 2.12.2.<br />

2.10 Reflection <strong>of</strong> pressure waves at an expansion in pipe area<br />

This section contains the non-isentropic analysis <strong>of</strong> unsteady gas flow at an expansion in<br />

pipe area. The sketch in Fig. 2.8(a) details the nomenclature for the flow regime, in precisely<br />

the same manner as in Sec. 2.9. However, to analyze the flow completely, the further information<br />

contained in sketch format in Figs. 2.9(a) <strong>and</strong> 2.10(a) must also be considered.<br />

In Fig. 2.10(a) the exp<strong>and</strong>ing flow is seen to leave turbulent vortices in the corners <strong>of</strong> the<br />

larger section. That the streamlines <strong>of</strong> the flow give rise to particle flow separation implies a<br />

gain <strong>of</strong> entropy from area section 1 to area section 2. This is summarized on the temperatureentropy<br />

diagram in Fig. 2.9(a) where the gain <strong>of</strong> entropy for the flow falling from pressure psi<br />

to pressure pS2 is clearly visible.<br />

As usual, the analysis <strong>of</strong> flow in this quasi-steady <strong>and</strong> non-isentropic context uses, where<br />

appropriate, the equations <strong>of</strong> continuity, the First Law <strong>of</strong> Thermodynamics <strong>and</strong> the momen-<br />

Tl<br />

T2<br />

T0<br />

ISENTROP CLINE<br />

* ^<br />

1<br />

^y^<br />

^^-<br />

> 1<br />

J<br />

/<br />

\yy j<br />

2 y<br />

(a) non-isentropic expansion (b) isentropic contraction<br />

yPs1<br />

/p p r<br />

r ><br />

ENTROPY<br />

Fig. 2.9 Temperature entropy characteristics for simple expansions <strong>and</strong> contractions.<br />

101

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!