15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

200 -,<br />

Q<br />

E 150<br />

sz<br />

I<br />

d 100<br />

i<br />

w<br />

50<br />

QUB270 CROSS SCAVENGED ENGINE<br />

WOT, 3000 rpm<br />

1000 2000 3000 4000 5000<br />

ENGINE SPEED, rpm<br />

AIRHEAD CLOSED<br />

Fig. 7.47 Effect <strong>of</strong> airhead on hydrocarbon emissions.<br />

AIRHEAD 50% OPEN<br />

AIRHEAD 100% OPEN<br />

While these are significant findings, the absolute levels <strong>of</strong> bsHC minimize at 60 g/kWh,<br />

which is considerably above the 25 g/kWh theoretically achieved by the low bmep optimization<br />

process described above for the simple two-stroke engine. It is not impossible to consider<br />

a combination <strong>of</strong> the two approaches.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the advantages <strong>of</strong> the airhead approach is that lost charge from the exhaust port<br />

tends to contain bypassed charge with a leaner air-to-fuel ratio than with homogeneous charging.<br />

This provides excess oxygen in the exhaust system <strong>and</strong> would improve the conversion<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the pollutants by an oxidation catalyst placed in it.<br />

7.4.2 Homogeneous charging with stratified combustion<br />

As was pointed out earlier, direct in-cylinder fuel injection is one <strong>of</strong> the obvious methods<br />

<strong>of</strong> reducing, or even eliminating, the loss <strong>of</strong> fuel to the exhaust port during the scavenge<br />

process. Fig. 7.30 illustrates the positioning <strong>of</strong> such a fuel injector for the combustion <strong>of</strong><br />

gasoline in a spark-ignition engine. Figs. 4.1(b) <strong>and</strong> 4.9 show the positioning <strong>of</strong> injectors for<br />

the injection <strong>of</strong> fuel into a compression-ignition engine, for it must not be forgotten that this<br />

engine falls directly, <strong>and</strong> more convincingly in the view <strong>of</strong> some, into this category.<br />

Gasoline injection into spark-ignition engines<br />

The potential difficulties <strong>of</strong> evaporating a fuel spray in time for a homogeneous combustion<br />

process to occur have been debated. The even more fundamental problem <strong>of</strong> attaining<br />

good flammability characteristics at light load <strong>and</strong> speed in a homogeneous combustion process<br />

has also been addressed. What, then, are the known experimental facts about in-cylinder<br />

fuel injection? Is the combustion process homogeneous, or does the desirable possibility <strong>of</strong><br />

stratified burning at light load <strong>and</strong> speed exist? Does the fuel vaporize in time to burn in an<br />

efficient manner? The answers to these questions are contained in the technical papers published<br />

by several authors; answers to the question <strong>of</strong> cost <strong>and</strong> design approach for tradition-<br />

512

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!