15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

From Eq. 8.5.2, this means at frequencies <strong>of</strong><br />

a0 2a0 3a0 4a0 5a0<br />

> » > » ? CIO.<br />

2L b 2Lb 2Lb 2Lb 2Lb<br />

At these frequencies the silencer will provide a transmission loss <strong>of</strong> zero, i.e., no silencing<br />

effect at all, <strong>and</strong> such frequencies are known as the "pass-b<strong>and</strong>s." It is also possible for the<br />

silencer to resonate in the transverse direction through the diametral dimension, db, <strong>and</strong> provide<br />

further pass-b<strong>and</strong> frequencies at what would normally be a rather high frequency level.<br />

There are many empirical equations in existence for the transmission loss <strong>of</strong> such a silencer,<br />

but Kato <strong>and</strong> Ishikawa [8.18] state that the theoretical solution <strong>of</strong> Fukuda [8.9] is<br />

found to be useful. The relationship <strong>of</strong> Fukuda [8.9] is as follows for the transmission loss <strong>of</strong><br />

a diffusing silencer, |3tr, in dB units:<br />

where<br />

<strong>and</strong><br />

Ptr=101og10(Ar2F(K,L)) 2 dB (8.5.3)<br />

=<br />

sin(KLb)xsin(KLt)<br />

COS(KLJ) x COS(KL2)<br />

K =<br />

27tf<br />

Not surprisingly, in such empirical relationships there are many correcting factors <strong>of</strong>fered<br />

for the modification <strong>of</strong> the basic relationship to cope with the effects <strong>of</strong> gas particle velocity,<br />

end correction effects for pipes which are re-entrant or flush with the box walls, boxes which<br />

are lined with absorbent material but not sufficiently dense as to be called an absorption<br />

silencer, etc. I leave it to you to pursue these myriad formulae, should you be so inclined,<br />

which can be found in the references.<br />

To assist you with the use <strong>of</strong> the basic equations for design purposes, a simple computer<br />

program is included in the Appendix Listing <strong>of</strong> Computer Programs as Prog.8.1, DIFFUSING<br />

SILENCER. The attenuation equations programmed are those seen above from Fukuda, Eqs.<br />

8.5.3-8.5.5.<br />

To determine if such a design program is useful in a practical sense, an analysis <strong>of</strong> SYS­<br />

TEM 2 <strong>and</strong> SYSTEM 3, emanating from Coates [8.3], is attempted <strong>and</strong> the results shown in<br />

Figs. 8.12 <strong>and</strong> 8.13. They show the computer screen output from Prog.8.1, which are plots <strong>of</strong><br />

the attenuation in dB as a function <strong>of</strong> noise frequency up to a maximum <strong>of</strong> 4 kHz, beyond<br />

which frequency most experts agree the diffusing silencer will have little silencing effect.<br />

The theory would continue to predict some attenuation to the highest frequency levels, indeed<br />

beyond the upper threshold <strong>of</strong> hearing. Also displayed on the computer screen are the input<br />

data for the geometry <strong>of</strong> that diffusing silencer according to the symbolism presented in Fig.<br />

a 0<br />

558<br />

(8.5.4)<br />

(8.5.5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!