15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

3.5.5.7 The use <strong>of</strong>Prog.3.4, LOOP SCAVENGE DESIGN<br />

A useful design program for all <strong>of</strong> the porting layouts illustrated in Figs. 1.2 <strong>and</strong> 3.37 is<br />

available from SAE. The program is self-explanatory <strong>and</strong> the typical outputs shown in Figs.<br />

3.38 <strong>and</strong> 3.39 are exactly what you see on the computer screen. The opening screen display<br />

asks you to decide on the number <strong>of</strong> transfer ports in the design, i.e., two, three, four or five,<br />

<strong>and</strong> from then on the design procedure will take the form <strong>of</strong> changing a particular data value<br />

until you are satisfied that the aims <strong>and</strong> objectives have been achieved. Such objectives would<br />

typically be the satisfaction <strong>of</strong> the criteria in Sees. 3.5.5.1 to 3.5.5.3 <strong>and</strong> to achieve the desired<br />

value <strong>of</strong> port width ratio, Cpb.<br />

Upon completion <strong>of</strong> the design process, the printer will provide hard copy <strong>of</strong> the screen<br />

<strong>and</strong>, as can be seen from Fig. 3.39, give some useful manufacturing data for the cylinder liner.<br />

This becomes even more pertinent for four <strong>and</strong> five port layouts, where the structural strength<br />

<strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> the port bars can become a major factor.<br />

It is interesting to note that in the actual design shown for a 70-mm-bore cylinder in this<br />

three transfer port layout, the Cpb value <strong>of</strong> 1.06 is about the same as for the QUB deflector<br />

piston engine; it was 1.03. It is clear that it would be possible to design a four or five port<br />

layout to increase the Cpb value to about 1.3. Remember that the uniflow engine had an<br />

equivalent value <strong>of</strong> 2.5, although if that uniflow engine is <strong>of</strong> the long stroke type, or is an<br />

opposed piston engine, it will require a Cpb value at that level to achieve equality <strong>of</strong> flow area<br />

with the other more conventional bore-stroke ratio power units.<br />

CURRENT INPUT DATA FOR BUOK FIG.3.35<br />

BORE DIAMETER= 70<br />

LINER THICKNE5S= 5<br />

MAXIMUM EXHAUST WIDTH= 40<br />

MAIN PORT, UP= AT 5<br />

TARGET MTU 33.5<br />

TARGET MT2= 14.0<br />

ANGLE AMU 65<br />

ANGLE AM2= 50<br />

REAR PORT, UPRa AT 55<br />

REAR PORT PLAN WIDTH=30<br />

OUTPUT DATA<br />

MAIN PORT PLAN WIDTHz 26.6<br />

TOTAL EFFECTIVE PORT WIDTHz 74.2<br />

TOTAL EFFECTIVE WIDTH/BORE RATICbl.Ofi<br />

Fig. 3.38 First page <strong>of</strong> output from Prog.3.4, giving the scavenge geometry <strong>of</strong> the ports.<br />

268

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!