15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 7 - Reduction <strong>of</strong> Fuel Consumption <strong>and</strong> Exhaust Emissions<br />

Eq. 1.5.22 predicts higher power <strong>and</strong> thermal efficiency for increasing compression ratio.<br />

Thermal efficiency is inversely related to brake specific fuel consumption, which can be seen<br />

from Eqs. 1.6.4 <strong>and</strong> 1.6.5, i.e., the higher the thermal efficiency, the lower the specific fuel<br />

consumption. That this holds true in practice is seen in Fig. A7.1. The bmep rises <strong>and</strong> the bsfc<br />

falls with increasing compression ratio, although the rate <strong>of</strong> change is beginning to decrease<br />

between a CRt <strong>of</strong> 7.5 <strong>and</strong> 8.0. The power output has increased <strong>and</strong> the bsfc has decreased by<br />

about 8% over the CRt simulation range from 6.5 to 8.0.<br />

Eq. 1.5.22 predicts that the change <strong>of</strong> thermal efficiency for the same change <strong>of</strong> compression<br />

ratios, i.e., from 6.5 to 8.0, is 7.2%. Thus even the most fundamental <strong>of</strong> thermodynamics<br />

does give some basic guidance. However, it should be pointed out that Eq. 1.5.22 forecasts a<br />

thermal efficiency <strong>of</strong> 56.5% for a compression ratio <strong>of</strong> 8.0, <strong>and</strong> 52.7% for a CRt <strong>of</strong> 6.5, when<br />

the actual values are less than half that!<br />

The effect <strong>of</strong> compression ratio on nitric oxide (NO) emissions<br />

Fig. A7.1 shows the brake specific nitric oxide emissions, bsNO, <strong>and</strong> the total nitric oxide<br />

emissions, NO, in g/kWh <strong>and</strong> g/h units, respectively. A somewhat dramatic increase with<br />

compression ratio is observed in both cases. The bsNO value has increased by 26.7% from<br />

4.5 to 5.7 g/kWh. The total NO emission has gone from 18 to 25 g/h, which is an increase <strong>of</strong><br />

39%. The word dramatic is not too strong a word to employ, as those engineers who have to<br />

meet emissions legislation usually struggle with gains or losses between 1 <strong>and</strong> 2% during<br />

R&D experimentation, <strong>and</strong> will visibly blanch at a simulation indicating changes <strong>of</strong> the order<br />

shown above.<br />

The origins <strong>of</strong> the change are to be found in Figs. A7.2 <strong>and</strong> A7.3. In Fig. A7.2 the peak<br />

temperatures in the burn zone are shown to rise with respect to CRt from 2340°C to 2390°C.<br />

As commented on in Appendix A4.1, the formation <strong>of</strong> NO is exponentially connected to these<br />

temperatures, so that even an apparently modest rise <strong>of</strong> only 50°C above 2340°C has the<br />

5 32 -,<br />

LU<br />

<br />

O<br />

26 -<br />

<<br />

£ 24<br />

CHAINSAW ENGINE, 9600 rpm<br />

PRESSURE<br />

\<br />

/<br />

POSITION<br />

r 14<br />

- 13<br />

- 12<br />

890 -,<br />

O<br />

OI<br />

H" 880 -<br />

LU<br />

O<br />

N<br />

Q<br />

LU<br />

z<br />

cr<br />

Z)<br />

CD<br />

870<br />

860 -<br />

BURN ZONE<br />

\<br />

11 850<br />

8<br />

TRAPPED COMPRESSION RATIO<br />

\<br />

O<br />

OI<br />

K<br />

LU<br />

Z<br />

o<br />

N<br />

Z<br />

CC<br />

Z><br />

m<br />

UNBURNED<br />

ZONE<br />

8<br />

2390<br />

-2380<br />

-2370<br />

-2360<br />

-2350<br />

2340<br />

Fig. A7.2 Effect <strong>of</strong> compression ratio on cylinder pressures <strong>and</strong> temperatures.<br />

537

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!