15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

silencer <strong>and</strong> its ducting, in terms <strong>of</strong> Fig. 5.6. The individual box volumes, VA <strong>and</strong> VB, are 300<br />

<strong>and</strong> 260 cm 3 , respectively, <strong>and</strong> it is clear that this is very small as it is not even ten cylinder<br />

volumes. The use <strong>of</strong> the acoustic program for a diffusing silencer, Prog.8.1, shows that there<br />

is absolutely no attenuation <strong>of</strong> sound below 800 Hz.<br />

For this simple silencer, it has two diffusing silencer segments. The question which the<br />

designer asks is the extent to which the final outlet can be throttled before unacceptable<br />

power loss occurs. The simulation answers this type <strong>of</strong> query with precision. The "st<strong>and</strong>ard"<br />

outlet pipe diameter is 12 mm. As a design exercise, this outlet pipe is crimped at the very end<br />

to give equivalent end orifices <strong>of</strong> 11, 10 <strong>and</strong> 9 mm diameter, labeled as X, Y <strong>and</strong> Z, respectively.<br />

The GPB simulation models these effects, using the intake silencer, F, in each case.<br />

The result <strong>of</strong> so doing is shown for the mass flow-time history at the exhaust exits in Fig.<br />

8.21, the noise spectra in Fig. 8.22, <strong>and</strong> the overall effect on noise <strong>and</strong> performance characteristics<br />

in Table 8.3.<br />

Name<br />

F<br />

X<br />

Y<br />

Z<br />

Table 8.3 Performance <strong>and</strong> exhaust silencing for the chainsaw<br />

Intake<br />

(dBA)<br />

82.9<br />

83.0<br />

83.1<br />

83.1<br />

Exhaust<br />

(dBlin)<br />

92.6<br />

91.3<br />

89.8<br />

88.2<br />

Exhaust<br />

(dBA)<br />

89.0<br />

88.4<br />

87.4<br />

85.9<br />

Total<br />

(dBA)<br />

89.8<br />

89.5<br />

88.7<br />

87.7<br />

bmep<br />

(bar)<br />

3.79<br />

3.71<br />

3.61<br />

3.50<br />

DR<br />

0.539<br />

0.535<br />

0.524<br />

0.509<br />

The expected results are achieved, namely choking the exhaust drops the delivery ratio<br />

<strong>and</strong> loses bmep. The amount is 0.29 bar, apparently a meager drop, but nearly 10% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

power output has actually been lost. The exhaust noise is lowered by some 3 dBA, <strong>and</strong> that<br />

0.012 -,<br />

o.ooo<br />

CHAINSAW ENGINE, 9600 rpm<br />

100 200 300<br />

CRANKSHAFT ANGLE, 2 atdc<br />

Fig. 8.21 Effect <strong>of</strong> modified exhaust system on the exit mass flow rate.<br />

574<br />

F<br />

400

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!