15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

o<br />

><br />

z~<br />

Q<br />

w<br />

CO<br />

UJ<br />

w<br />

g<br />

x<br />

O<br />

z<br />

o<br />

z<br />

o<br />

m<br />

DC<br />

<<br />

O<br />

Chapter 7 - Reduction <strong>of</strong> Fuel Consumption <strong>and</strong> Exhaust Emissions<br />

AIR-FUEL RATIO<br />

Fig. 7.8 Air-fuel ratio effect on CO <strong>and</strong> O2 emissions at 10% throttle.<br />

air lost during the scavenge process with about 1 % coming from the inefficiency <strong>of</strong> the combustion<br />

process. These are probably the best fuel consumption <strong>and</strong> emission values recorded<br />

on a simple engine at QUB, particularly for an engine capable <strong>of</strong> 6.2 bar bmep without exhaust<br />

tuning. By comparing notes with colleagues in industrial circles, it is probable that<br />

these figures represent a "state-<strong>of</strong>-the-art" position for a simple, single-cylinder, two-stroke<br />

engine at this point in history. The levels <strong>of</strong> fuel economy <strong>and</strong> exhaust emissions at the lighter<br />

load point <strong>of</strong> 2.65 bar bmep would be regarded as particularly impressive, <strong>and</strong> there would be<br />

four-stroke cycle engines which could not improve on these numbers. It is noticeable that the<br />

carbon monoxide levels are at least as low as those from four-stroke cycle engines, but this is<br />

the one data value which truly emanates from the combustion process alone <strong>and</strong> is not confused<br />

by intervening scavenging losses.<br />

Nevertheless, the values <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbon emission are, by automotive st<strong>and</strong>ards, very<br />

high. The raw value <strong>of</strong> HC emission caused by combustion inefficiency alone should not<br />

exceed 400 ppm, yet it is 4200 ppm at full load. This is a measure <strong>of</strong> the ineffectiveness <strong>of</strong><br />

homogeneous charging, i.e., scavenging, <strong>of</strong> the simple two-stroke engine. It forever rules out<br />

the use <strong>of</strong> simple two-stroke engines in automotive applications against a background <strong>of</strong><br />

legislated emissions levels.<br />

To reinforce these comments, recall from Sec. 1.6.3 that exhaust oxygen concentration<br />

can be used to compute trapping efficiency, TE. The data sets shown in Figs. 7.5 <strong>and</strong> 7.8<br />

would yield a TE value <strong>of</strong> 0.6 at full throttle <strong>and</strong> i 0.86 at one-tenth throttle. This latter is a<br />

remarkably high figure <strong>and</strong> attests to the excellence <strong>of</strong> the scavenge design. What these data<br />

imply, however, is that if the fuel were not short-circuited with the air, <strong>and</strong> all other engine<br />

behavioral factors remained as they were, the exhaust HC level could possibly be about 350<br />

ppm, but the full throttle bsfc would actually become 240 g/kWh <strong>and</strong> the one-tenth throttle<br />

bsfc would be at 260 g/kWh. These would be exceptional bsfc values by any st<strong>and</strong>ards <strong>and</strong><br />

475

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!