15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

The First Law <strong>of</strong> Thermodynamics in Eq. 2.12.6 reduces to:<br />

GsfMXn + J^ - l)) 2 - (a01Xt) 2 } + (GsaoiJX,, - Xrl)) 2 - c 2 = 0 (2.12.11)<br />

The momentum equation, Eq. 2.12.7, reduces to:<br />

PoA2[x? 7 - (Xi2 + Xr2 - l) Gr<br />

+[poi(Xn + Xrl - l^A^aoifXn - Xrl)][ct + G5a01(Xi2 - Xr2)] = 0 (2A2A2)<br />

The five equations, Eqs. 2.12.8 to 2.12.12, cannot be reduced any further as they are<br />

polynomial functions <strong>of</strong> all five variables, Xri, Xr2>, Xt, ao2i <strong>and</strong> ct. These functions can be<br />

solved by a st<strong>and</strong>ard iterative method for such problems. I have determined that the Newton-<br />

Raphson method for the solution <strong>of</strong> multiple polynomial equations is stable, accurate <strong>and</strong><br />

rapid in execution. The arithmetic solution on a computer is conducted by a Gaussian Elimination<br />

method. Numerical examples are given in Sec. 2.12.2.<br />

It is not easy to supply initial guesses which are close to the final answers for the iteration<br />

method on a computer. The Benson "constant pressure" assumption is <strong>of</strong> great assistance in<br />

this matter. Even with this assistance to the numerical solution, this theory must be programmed<br />

with great care to avoid arithmetic instability during its execution.<br />

2.12.1 Flow at pipe restrictions where sonic particle velocity is encountered<br />

In the above analysis <strong>of</strong> unsteady gas flow at restrictions in pipe area the particle velocity<br />

at the throat will quite commonly be found to reach, or even attempt to exceed, the local<br />

acoustic velocity. This is not possible in thermodynamic or gas-dynamic terms. The highest<br />

particle velocity permissible is the local acoustic velocity at the throat, i.e., the flow is permitted<br />

to become choked. Therefore, during the mathematical solution <strong>of</strong> Eqs. 2.12.8 to 2.12.12,<br />

the local Mach number at the throat is monitored <strong>and</strong> retained at unity if it is found to exceed<br />

it.<br />

c<br />

As, M t = —— = 1 then c t = amXt (2.12.13)<br />

a 01 A t<br />

This simplifies the entire procedure for this gives a direct relationship between two <strong>of</strong> the<br />

unknowns <strong>and</strong> replaces one <strong>of</strong> the equations employed above. It is probably easier from an<br />

arithmetic st<strong>and</strong>point to eliminate the momentum equation, but probably more accurate thermodynamically<br />

to retain it!<br />

The acquisition <strong>of</strong> all related data for pressure, density, particle velocity <strong>and</strong> mass flow<br />

rate at both superposition stations <strong>and</strong> at the throat follows directly from the solution <strong>of</strong> the<br />

four polynomials for Xri, Xr2, Xt, ao2) <strong>and</strong> ct.<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!