15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> radius input data values <strong>of</strong> 65 <strong>and</strong> 120, respectively, give the deflector flow area, A^ef, as<br />

1231 mm 2 . Consequently, the CA ratio is calculated as 1.16, which would be regarded as a<br />

satisfactory value. The value <strong>of</strong> deflector radius, selected here as 120 mm, <strong>and</strong> known to<br />

provide good scavenging for this particular bore dimension <strong>of</strong> 70 mm [1.10], can vary over a<br />

wide range from 30% to 80% greater than the cylinder bore dimension without unduly affecting<br />

the quality <strong>of</strong> scavenging.<br />

It is difficult to over-emphasize the importance <strong>of</strong> the deflection ratio in the design <strong>of</strong><br />

cross-scavenged engines, <strong>and</strong> further information with respect to the QUB type <strong>of</strong> cross scavenging<br />

is presented in Fig. 3.33. This shows the experimental results for trapping efficiency<br />

for two QUB-type engines, one with a deflection ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.15 <strong>and</strong> the other with 1.44. The<br />

one with the CA value <strong>of</strong> 1.15 is the QUBCR cylinder discussed in Sec. 3.2.4 <strong>and</strong> Figs. 3.12<br />

<strong>and</strong> 3.13. The higher CA ratio lowers the trapping efficiency <strong>of</strong> the QUB type <strong>of</strong> cross-scavenged<br />

cylinder down to a level which places it equal to an optimized example <strong>of</strong> a classic<br />

cross-scavenged design. As further evidence, the QUB type with the higher CA ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.44<br />

was built as a firing engine, not just as a model cylinder for experimentation on the singlecycle<br />

scavenge rig, <strong>and</strong> the resulting performance characteristics fell at least 10% short <strong>of</strong> the<br />

behavior reported for the QUB 400 loop-scavenged research engine in Chapters 5 <strong>and</strong> 7; in<br />

other words, they were somewhat disappointing. To emphasize the point, a QUB-type deflector<br />

piston engine <strong>of</strong> the square dimensions <strong>of</strong> 70 mm bore <strong>and</strong> stroke <strong>and</strong> with a deflection<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> 1.16, with a transfer port layout very similar to that shown in Fig. 3.34(b), was constructed<br />

<strong>and</strong> experimentally produced very similar levels <strong>of</strong> brake specific fuel consumption,<br />

bmep, trapping efficiency <strong>and</strong> exhaust emission characteristics to the QUB 400 loop-scavenged<br />

engine [3.39]. The application <strong>of</strong> the design into other areas ranging from direct-injection<br />

to mopeds <strong>and</strong> biogas engines can be found in other publications [3.39-3.44].<br />

As described previously for the classic cross-scavenged cylinder, the deflection ratio criterion<br />

for the QUB type is the same:<br />

1.1

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!