15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6 • Empirical Assistance for the <strong>Design</strong>er<br />

Observe that the time area values at an exhaust port timing <strong>of</strong> 108° are the same as those<br />

given in Table 6.2 as measured for the chainsaw. It can be seen that the transfer time area is<br />

virtually on its "target" value, that for blowdown it is at a 104° atdc timing, <strong>and</strong> the total time<br />

area "target" for the exhaust port is somewhat higher than any to be examined.<br />

The results <strong>of</strong> the simulation are presented in Figs. 6.8 to 6.11, for bmep, air flow, specific<br />

fuel consumption <strong>and</strong> specific hydrocarbon emissions, respectively. In each figure the performance<br />

parameter is shown with respect to the exhaust <strong>and</strong> blowdown time areas <strong>and</strong> the<br />

exhaust port timing is also indicated. As far as power <strong>and</strong> torque are concerned, in Fig. 6.8 it<br />

would appear that the target time area values are very relevant, for the trend is to peak at the<br />

104° port timing value. The air flow, plotted as delivery ratio in Fig. 6.9, climbs toward the<br />

104° exhaust port timing, but the scale is narrow <strong>and</strong> it is virtually constant. The specific fuel<br />

consumption, shown in Fig. 6.10, would appear to reach a plateau at the 104 <strong>and</strong> 106° exhaust<br />

port timings, but superior to that achieved at the st<strong>and</strong>ard 108° timing value. However, when<br />

the hydrocarbon emissions are examined in Fig. 6.11, the basic trend is for their deterioration<br />

with a longer exhaust period. The best HC emission value is seen to be at a 106° exhaust<br />

timing. In modern times, with hydrocarbon emissions now controlled by legislation in many<br />

countries, the designer can no longer merely optimize the design for power alone.<br />

From this analysis, the st<strong>and</strong>ard port timing <strong>and</strong> area can be seen to be a compromise<br />

between the acquisition <strong>of</strong> power <strong>and</strong> the reduction <strong>of</strong> HC emissions. It is also clear that a<br />

designer using a time area analysis would have arrived into this area <strong>of</strong> engine geometry more<br />

rapidly than by merely guessing port timings <strong>and</strong> widths, <strong>and</strong> subsequently indulging in an<br />

experimental R&D program. The use <strong>of</strong> the engine simulation ensures that the design process<br />

is even more rapid <strong>and</strong> more accurate.<br />

A change <strong>of</strong> transfer port timing with others constant<br />

Let the exhaust port timing remain at the "st<strong>and</strong>ard" value <strong>of</strong> 108° atdc <strong>and</strong> change the<br />

transfer port timing from 117° atdc to 125° atdc in 2° steps. This will have the effect <strong>of</strong><br />

altering the pumping behavior <strong>of</strong> the crankcase <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> changing the blowdown time area as<br />

well as that <strong>of</strong> the transfer ports. The results <strong>of</strong> these geometrical alterations are summarized<br />

1—<br />

JO<br />

bmep,<br />

oo .<br />

3.7 -<br />

exhaust time area<br />

/ EO104 a<br />

/ EO 110 9<br />

3.8<br />

3.7 -<br />

blowdown time area<br />

EO 104*<br />

EO110 9<br />

3.6 - — i — i — i — i — i — 3.6<br />

60 70 80 90 1 2 3<br />

Asve, s/m x 10000 Asvb, s/m x 10000<br />

Fig. 6.8 Effect <strong>of</strong> exhaust timing on engine torque (bmep).<br />

All

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!