15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Design</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Simulation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

seizure. The criterion for port width, in order to eliminate ring pegging, is the same as that<br />

debated for uniflow scavenging above, i.e., the port angle shown in Fig. 3.32 as the subtended<br />

value, 0p, should be less than 25° in most circumstances.<br />

The basic layout is shown in Fig. 3.32(a) with further amplification in Fig. 1.3. Fig.<br />

3.32(a) contains a plan section with a view on the piston crown <strong>and</strong> also an elevation section<br />

through the scavenge <strong>and</strong> exhaust ports at the bdc position. Further amplification is also given<br />

by Plates 1.6 <strong>and</strong> 4.2. Fig. 3.32 shows no splitters in the scavenge duct separating the scavenge<br />

ports <strong>and</strong> which would give directional guidance to the scavenge flow. While this is the<br />

preferred geometry so that the gas flow follows the design directions, it is rarely seen in<br />

practice <strong>and</strong> the open transfer duct from crankcase to the port belt, which is illustrated here, is<br />

the common practice in the industry. The "ears" <strong>of</strong> the deflector are usually centered about a<br />

diameter or are placed slightly toward the scavenge side. The edge <strong>of</strong> the ears are normally<br />

chamfered at 45° <strong>and</strong> given some (0.5 to 1.0 mm) clearance, xc, from the bore so that they<br />

may enter the combustion chamber above the tdc point without interference. Contrary to<br />

popular belief, I [1.10] showed that while this apparently gives a direct short-circuit path to<br />

the exhaust port, the actual SE-SR characteristic was hardly affected. Consequently, any loss<br />

<strong>of</strong> engine performance caused by chamfering 50% <strong>of</strong>f the ears <strong>of</strong> the deflector, <strong>and</strong> giving<br />

them the necessary side clearance, must be due to a further deterioration <strong>of</strong> the combustion<br />

efficiency by introducing even longer <strong>and</strong> more tortuous flame paths. The "ears" <strong>of</strong> the solid<br />

deflector are chamfered to prevent the corners from glowing <strong>and</strong> inducing pre-ignition (see<br />

Chapter 4).<br />

In Chapters 6 <strong>and</strong> 7 there will be discussions on the determination <strong>of</strong> port timings <strong>and</strong><br />

port heights for all types <strong>of</strong> engines. In terms <strong>of</strong> Fig. 3.32(a), it will be assumed that the<br />

scavenge port height at bdc is hs, <strong>and</strong> there are a number <strong>of</strong> scavenge ports, Ns. The most<br />

common value for Ns is three, but multiple port designs with five or more scavenge ports have<br />

been seen in practice. If the ports are rectangular in pr<strong>of</strong>ile, the maximum scavenge flow area,<br />

Asp, <strong>and</strong> including corner radii, rc, is given by:<br />

Asp = Ns(hsxs - rc 2 (4 - %)) (3.5.2)<br />

Where the maximum area <strong>of</strong> the ports at bdc are segments <strong>of</strong> drilled holes, the designer is<br />

forced to calculate that area for use in Eq. 3.5.2. There are two important design criteria, one<br />

being the match <strong>of</strong> the maximum scavenge flow area, Asp, to the deflector flow area, A

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!