15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 7 • Reduction <strong>of</strong> Fuel Consumption <strong>and</strong> Exhaust Emissions<br />

Fig. 7.37 Hydrocarbon emission levels from the Piaggio stratified charging<br />

engine (from Ref. [7.1]).<br />

ditions where the machine is accelerated <strong>and</strong> driven in the 15-50 km/h zone. The proposed<br />

European ECE-R40 cycle is such a driving cycle [7.21].<br />

The reduction <strong>of</strong> hydrocarbon emissions is particularly impressive, as can be seen from a<br />

direct comparison <strong>of</strong> the original engine in Fig. 7.11 with the stratified charging engine in Fig.<br />

7.37. The st<strong>and</strong>ard engine, already discussed in Sec. 7.2.1, showed a minimum contour <strong>of</strong><br />

1500 ppm HC (C6, NDIR), at a light load but high speed point. In the center <strong>of</strong> the load-speed<br />

map in Fig. 7.11 the figures are in the 2500 ppm region, <strong>and</strong> at the light load point <strong>of</strong> 1 bar <strong>and</strong><br />

1500 rpm, the figure is somewhat problematic but 5000 ppm would be typical. For the stratified<br />

charging engine the minimum contour is reduced to 200 ppm HC, the center <strong>of</strong> the loadspeed<br />

picture is about 500 ppm, <strong>and</strong> the all-important light load <strong>and</strong> speed level is somewhat<br />

in excess <strong>of</strong> 1000 ppm. This is a very significant reduction <strong>and</strong> is the level <strong>of</strong> diminution<br />

required for a successful automotive engine before the application <strong>of</strong> catalytic after-treatment.<br />

A comparison <strong>of</strong> the carbon monoxide emission levels <strong>of</strong> the st<strong>and</strong>ard engine in Fig. 7.10<br />

<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the stratified charging engine in Fig. 7.36 shows significant improvements in the two<br />

areas where it really matters, i.e., at light loads <strong>and</strong> speeds <strong>and</strong> at high loads <strong>and</strong> speeds. In<br />

both cases the CO emission is reduced from 2-3% to 0.2-0.3%, i.e., a factor <strong>of</strong> 10. The absolute<br />

value <strong>of</strong> the best CO emission at 0.2% is quite good, remembering that these experimental<br />

data were acquired in 1978.<br />

Also note that the peak bmep <strong>of</strong> the engine is slightly reduced from 4.8 bar to 4.1 bar due<br />

to the stratified charging process, <strong>and</strong> there is some evidence that there may be some diminution<br />

in the air utilization rate <strong>of</strong> the engine. This is supplied by the high oxygen emission<br />

503

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!