15.02.2013 Views

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

Design and Simulation of Two Stroke Engines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 - Gas Flow through <strong>Two</strong>-<strong>Stroke</strong> <strong>Engines</strong><br />

This immediately simplifies the entire procedure as it gives a direct solution for one <strong>of</strong><br />

the unknowns:<br />

if, Msl = 1<br />

then,<br />

Mri+Xjtfa-Mri) 1 + G4XU<br />

x rl _ " (2.10.11)<br />

M G<br />

sl + 5<br />

G<br />

6<br />

The acquisition <strong>of</strong> all related data for pressure, density, particle velocity <strong>and</strong> mass flow<br />

rate at both superposition stations follows directly from the solution <strong>of</strong> the three polynomials<br />

forXr l, Xr2 <strong>and</strong> ao2, in the manner indicated in Sec. 2.9.<br />

In many classic analyses <strong>of</strong> choked flow a "critical pressure ratio" is determined for flow<br />

from the upstream point to the throat where sonic flow is occurring. That method assumes<br />

zero particle velocity at the upstream point; such is clearly not the case here. Therefore, that<br />

concept cannot be employed in this geometry for unsteady gas flow.<br />

2.11 Reflection <strong>of</strong> pressure waves at a contraction in pipe area<br />

This section contains the isentropic analysis <strong>of</strong> unsteady gas flow at a contraction in pipe<br />

area. The sketch in Fig. 2.8(b) details the nomenclature for the flow regime, in precisely the<br />

same manner as in Sec. 2.9. However, to analyze the flow completely, the further information<br />

contained in sketch format in Figs. 2.9(b) <strong>and</strong> 2.10(b) must also be considered.<br />

In Fig. 2.10(b) the contracting flow is seen to flow smoothly from the larger section to the<br />

smaller area section. The streamlines <strong>of</strong> the flow do not give rise to particle flow separation<br />

<strong>and</strong> so it is considered to be isentropic flow. This is in line with conventional nozzle theory as<br />

observed in many st<strong>and</strong>ard texts in thermodynamics. It is summarized on the temperatureentropy<br />

diagram in Fig. 2.9(b) where there is no entropy gain for the flow falling from pressure<br />

psi to pressure ps2.<br />

As usual, the analysis <strong>of</strong> quasi-steady flow in this context uses, where appropriate, the<br />

equations <strong>of</strong> continuity, the First Law <strong>of</strong> Thermodynamics <strong>and</strong> the momentum equation. However,<br />

one less equation is required by comparison with the analysis for exp<strong>and</strong>ing or diffusing<br />

flow in Sec. 2.10. This is because the value <strong>of</strong> the reference state is known at superposition<br />

station 2, for the flow is isentropic:<br />

Toi=To2 or a0i=ao2 (2.11.1)<br />

As there is no entropy gain, that equation normally reserved for the analysis <strong>of</strong> nonisentropic<br />

flow, the momentum equation, can be neglected in the ensuing analytic method.<br />

The properties <strong>and</strong> composition <strong>of</strong> the gas particles are those <strong>of</strong> the gas at the upstream<br />

point. Therefore the various functions <strong>of</strong> the gas properties are:<br />

y = Yl R = R! G5 = G5i G7 = G7i , etc.<br />

105

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!