28.09.2013 Views

Avhandlingens - Umeå universitet

Avhandlingens - Umeå universitet

Avhandlingens - Umeå universitet

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Summary<br />

Introduction<br />

The gap between theory and practice is in literature described as a common<br />

problem when the relation between teachers and research results is discussed.<br />

Sometimes teachers are blamed for being unwilling to pay attention to results.<br />

Research carried out during the last 50 years has often seen teachers as an object<br />

of the research and this may have contributed to widening the gap. In this thesis<br />

a praxis-oriented research project is described, where teachers together with<br />

researchers were involved in carrying out the research.<br />

Purpose<br />

The purpose of this thesis is to analyse and describe how teachers during an<br />

in-service training period develop theoretical knowledge about focusing on<br />

the content when planning instruction, and in what way this has an impact<br />

on the students’ learning. The research questions are as follows: (1) What<br />

eventual differences concerning questions about method and content can be<br />

observed in teachers’ discussions about teaching of a specific object of learning<br />

and in their handling of this object of learning in an in-service training period?<br />

(2) Can these eventual differences be related to the teachers’ insights in the<br />

theoretical framework, i.e. the variation theory? (3) Can eventual differences in<br />

the students’ learning be related to differences in the teachers’ handling of the<br />

object of learning?<br />

Theoretical framework<br />

The variation theory is used as a framework for analysis as well as for planning<br />

instruction. It is developed from the phenomenographic approach which is an<br />

approach about different ways of experiencing a phenomenon or a situation,<br />

and like the variation theory it adopts a non-dualistic ontology. It means learning<br />

can neither be connected to the individual nor to the social context, but seen<br />

as a conjunction of the two. The non-dualistic picture brings the learner and<br />

the phenomenon being learned into the same world of experience.<br />

The theoretical assumption is that the ability to learn presupposes an<br />

experience of variation if we view learning as a change in the learner’s capacity<br />

to experience something new in the world. This variation can be described in<br />

terms of discernment, simultaneity and variation, all three very closely connected<br />

to each other. The term experience is defined as the way awareness is structured<br />

and organized in a specific moment. Experience is also defined as being able<br />

to discern something from a given context and to relate it to this context or<br />

another. In every situation there are many aspects to discern. If every aspect<br />

157

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!