The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact - ELTE BTK Történelem Szakos Portál
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact - ELTE BTK Történelem Szakos Portál
The Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact - ELTE BTK Történelem Szakos Portál
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Baptiste, Antoine<br />
What did French MPs think about it? Political reactions and speeches<br />
about <strong>Ribbentrop</strong> – <strong>Molotov</strong> pact.<br />
As French historians have been little attention about it, 1 1939 French MPs<br />
have little interview in German-Soviet pact. <strong>The</strong>y have remained silence most<br />
of the time in Hemicycle as in the Palais-Bourbon corridors. And the few<br />
interventions we could found in the French press are, most of the time, fleeting,<br />
without any substance. We also find this quietness in French scientific works in<br />
which the analysis of the MPs reactions is completely reduce very often to a<br />
few lines.<br />
Yet the international situation is the most execrable situation : Munich,<br />
Czechoslovakia, Steel <strong>Pact</strong>, Italian political expansionism, Spanish civil war<br />
and the Polish aims of the hitlerian wills. Actually, the German-Soviet pact<br />
chooses „l'ultime étape [...] d'une longue période de tensions internationales” 2<br />
during which French political life is influenced by a lot of information and<br />
different pretension of the Third Reich offensive policy.<br />
Thus it is more surprising that in such context of the rise of perils which<br />
leads directed to the war – we don’t know it yet at that time, and we are see that<br />
a lot of people don’t think about it – the elected people of the Nation were<br />
prostrated in a silence which become deafening. Such a paradox must drow the<br />
historian’s attention how is surprised by such dissension. Where are the<br />
speeches address to the gallery? <strong>The</strong> invectives between political parties?<br />
Where are the strong opinions, calls to the people in the press and on the radio?<br />
Actually, nowhere. In front of this lack of speech and of argued debate, the<br />
material necessary to the historian, the sources, matrix of his reflexion, is<br />
considerably reducing. 3 A problem without solution is not a problem, lets take<br />
this lack of sources on the other way round and makes a demonstration in the<br />
1 About the french historiographic report of <strong>Ribbentrop</strong>-<strong>Molotov</strong> pact read: LACHAISE,<br />
Bernard: L'historiographie du pacte <strong>Ribbentrop</strong> – <strong>Molotov</strong> en France depuis 1945.,<br />
communication (published in this book) at the international conference, <strong>Ribbentrop</strong>-<strong>Molotov</strong> pact<br />
August 1939 and this European effects at <strong>ELTE</strong>, Budapest, December 3 th and 5 th 2009.<br />
2 BRUNET, Jean-Paul: La presse française et le pacte germano-soviétique (août 1939), In:<br />
Relations internationales, 1974, n 2, 187-212.<br />
3 By lack of informations on the first selected subject : <strong>The</strong> <strong>Ribbentrop</strong> – <strong>Molotov</strong> pact to the<br />
Palais-Bourbon, the corpus of sources, initially centered on the parliamentary debates of the<br />
period, was extended to the MPs reactions and speeches in the French press of 1939, in particular<br />
the great figures and the parliamentary presidents of groups. Were targeted by our research: Léon<br />
Blum (SFIO), Albert Chichéry (Radical Party), Renaud Jean (PCF), Maurice Thorez (PCF),<br />
Jacques Duclos (PCF), Marcel Gitton (PCF), Joseph Denais (Republican Federation), Léon<br />
Barety (Democratic Republican Alliance), Gabriel Lafaye (USR), Georges Mandel (Republican<br />
Independence), Jean Ybarnegaray (French Social Party) and Édouard Daladier in the double<br />
focal distance of president of Council, minister for the War and National defense, and great<br />
figure of the Radical Party.<br />
111