Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Lloyd<br />
Table 3. Sheep graz<strong>in</strong>g days <strong>in</strong> a 32 ha paddock grazed throughout 1999. The area was direct seeded to<br />
saltbush <strong>in</strong> August 1997. It had not been grazed until the sheep were <strong>in</strong>troduced <strong>in</strong> January 1999.<br />
Date <strong>in</strong> Date out Total days Sheep numbers Sheep days<br />
04/01/99 11/01/99 8 450 3,600<br />
11/01/99 08/03/99 56 386 21,616<br />
08/03/99 16/03/99 9 365 2,385<br />
17/03/99 11/04/99 19 480 9,120<br />
01/05/99 06/05/99 6 545 3,270<br />
06/05/99 14/05/99 8 586 4,688<br />
07/06/99 20/06/99 14 375 5,250<br />
21/06/99 01/07/99 11 455 5,005<br />
01/07/99 15/07/99 17 300 5,100<br />
31/07/99 14/08/99 15 300 4,500<br />
16/09/99 26/09/99 11 1,052 11,572<br />
09/11/99 18/11/99 10 465 4,950<br />
19/11/99 22/12/99 34 527 17,918<br />
99,874 sheep days @ 32 ha @ 365 days per year = 8.6 DSE/ha (annualised basis)<br />
It can be seen from the details from “Bundilla” that<br />
saltbush, <strong>in</strong> conjunction <strong>with</strong> understory annuals<br />
and hay, can significantly <strong>in</strong>crease the carry<strong>in</strong>g<br />
capacity <strong>of</strong> saltland. It can also be seen that<br />
saltbush can significantly lower watertables.<br />
ECONOMICS – IS IT WORTH IT?<br />
But what <strong>of</strong> the economics? Is it worth it? From<br />
the work done on “Bundilla” and from the<br />
experience <strong>of</strong> other saltland farmers, the answer is<br />
undoubtedly "YES". In seasons <strong>of</strong> below-average<br />
w<strong>in</strong>ter annual feed production, the addition <strong>of</strong> hay<br />
enables sheep to be reta<strong>in</strong>ed which otherwise<br />
would have to be sold, agisted or fed expensive<br />
supplements. All the saltbush is now direct seeded<br />
on “Bundilla” <strong>with</strong> our own seed<strong>in</strong>g mach<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Seed is harvested on the property.<br />
– 6 –<br />
Farmers’ costs can be reduced significantly if they<br />
are prepared to do more <strong>of</strong> the work themselves.<br />
For <strong>in</strong>stance, the retail cost <strong>of</strong> saltbush seed is<br />
around $50 per Kg, but we harvest our own. To<br />
get a true cost <strong>of</strong> establishment all costs need to<br />
be <strong>in</strong>cluded. The actual cash cost for us to seed a<br />
hectare <strong>of</strong> saltbush is the cost <strong>of</strong> the spray ($10)<br />
and vermiculite ($14), a total <strong>of</strong> $24/ha. For this<br />
we would expect up to 2,000 plants per Ha. So<br />
much for it be<strong>in</strong>g too expensive. Where else could<br />
we more than treble production from an area <strong>of</strong><br />
land <strong>with</strong> such a small additional cost?<br />
Table 4 shows the relative cost <strong>of</strong> contractor<br />
versus farmer operated direct seed<strong>in</strong>g. If the row<br />
spac<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong>creased <strong>with</strong> less rows <strong>of</strong> saltbush<br />
per hectare, the costs for both contractor and<br />
farmer-seeded will be reduced accord<strong>in</strong>gly.