Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Pannell<br />
Table 1: Summary <strong>of</strong> economic analyses <strong>of</strong> <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> management for six towns <strong>in</strong> the Rural Towns Program<br />
Town<br />
(timescale <strong>of</strong><br />
estimates)<br />
Tim<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> onset<br />
<strong>of</strong> major costs<br />
Damage costs from<br />
<strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> if no works<br />
undertaken<br />
Total cost <strong>of</strong><br />
possible works to<br />
control ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
groundwater<br />
Potential ga<strong>in</strong> from<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g works<br />
(years) ($ million) ($ million) ($ million)<br />
Brookton (60 years) 4 0.62 0.28 0.34<br />
Corrig<strong>in</strong> (60 years) 2 0.21 -0.10 0.31<br />
Cranbrook (60 years) 22 0.61 2.3 to 5.7 -1.6 to -5.1<br />
Katann<strong>in</strong>g (30 years) 1 6.9 7.6 -0.74<br />
Merred<strong>in</strong> (60 years) 26 0.38 1.8 to 4.6 -1.4 to –4.2<br />
Morawa (30 years) 1 0.25 0.90 -0.65<br />
The f<strong>in</strong>al column shows an estimate <strong>of</strong> the net<br />
benefits <strong>of</strong> strong <strong>in</strong>tervention <strong>in</strong> the towns, based<br />
on an assumption that it would result <strong>in</strong> prevention<br />
<strong>of</strong> all costs listed <strong>in</strong> the third column. It is strik<strong>in</strong>g<br />
that <strong>in</strong> four <strong>of</strong> the six towns, the economics <strong>of</strong> the<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>terventions studied appear adverse.<br />
The two positive results, Brookton and Corrig<strong>in</strong>,<br />
have the advantage <strong>of</strong> be<strong>in</strong>g able to make some<br />
valuable use <strong>of</strong> the pumped water. Even <strong>in</strong><br />
Katann<strong>in</strong>g, which is probably the most saltthreatened<br />
town <strong>in</strong> Australia, the costs estimated<br />
for disposal <strong>of</strong> pumped sal<strong>in</strong>e water <strong>in</strong>to l<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
evaporation ponds is so high that it roughly cancels<br />
out all the benefits from <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> prevention. If it is<br />
difficult to economically justify l<strong>in</strong>ed evaporation<br />
bas<strong>in</strong>s to protect the extreme example <strong>of</strong><br />
Katann<strong>in</strong>g, it seems unlikely that this approach<br />
could pay <strong>of</strong>f <strong>in</strong> any less extreme cases.<br />
In the case <strong>of</strong> Merred<strong>in</strong>, the consultants concluded<br />
that “the actions warranted for immediate<br />
implementation <strong>in</strong>clude advice <strong>with</strong> water<br />
management to reduce recharge and damage to<br />
<strong>in</strong>frastructure, cont<strong>in</strong>ual improvement <strong>in</strong> dra<strong>in</strong>age<br />
systems, and tree plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> the town to<br />
reduce recharge,” (Dames & Moore – NRM 2001,<br />
p.13).<br />
Other <strong>in</strong>frastructure<br />
It was noted above that the biggest costs <strong>in</strong>curred<br />
<strong>in</strong> salt-affected towns are from damage to roads.<br />
Roads outside towns will also be affected. Dames<br />
& Moore – NRM (2001) based their road cost<strong>in</strong>gs<br />
on a report <strong>of</strong> the Murray Darl<strong>in</strong>g Bas<strong>in</strong><br />
Commission (1994), which reported, for example:<br />
– 7 –<br />
• The average life <strong>of</strong> sealed roads <strong>in</strong> Victorian<br />
irrigation areas <strong>with</strong> water tables <strong>of</strong> 2.0 m or<br />
less was 20 years, compared <strong>with</strong> 40 years for<br />
equivalent roads <strong>in</strong> dryland areas over deep<br />
groundwater tables.<br />
• When replac<strong>in</strong>g major highways, the additional<br />
cost <strong>in</strong> situations <strong>with</strong> shallow groundwater<br />
(less than 2.0 m) was around $100,000 per<br />
km, on top <strong>of</strong> the normal construction cost <strong>of</strong><br />
around $400,000 per km. Repair costs for a<br />
major highway due to shallow groundwater<br />
(i.e. the cost <strong>of</strong> patch<strong>in</strong>g and repair<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
road to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> the pavement condition) was<br />
$10,000 per km per year.<br />
• For a standard sealed country road, estimated<br />
construction costs were $100,000 per km,<br />
plus $25,000 to $35,000 <strong>in</strong> locations <strong>with</strong><br />
shallow watertables. Additional ma<strong>in</strong>tenance<br />
costs due to shallow water tables would be<br />
$400 to $2,900 per km.<br />
• For gravel roads, the construction cost was<br />
$7,000 per km plus $3,000 for shallow water<br />
tables, <strong>with</strong> annual ma<strong>in</strong>tenance <strong>in</strong>creased by<br />
$200 per km for shallow watertables.<br />
Campbell et al. (2000) estimated that for the<br />
Great Southern region <strong>of</strong> southwest Western<br />
Australia, 1,200 build<strong>in</strong>gs (15% <strong>of</strong> all build<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong><br />
the region), 3,300 km <strong>of</strong> roads (26%) and<br />
16,000 farm dams (44%) face the risk <strong>of</strong> damage<br />
or destruction from <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong>. No similar study has