07.04.2013 Views

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Table 2: Farm bus<strong>in</strong>ess performance for four WA <strong>Wheatbelt</strong> regions<br />

(average for the three years 1996/7 to 1998/9) 1<br />

Porter, Bartle and Cooper<br />

Unit Average2 Top 25% 2 Bottom 25% 2<br />

a. Eastern <strong>Wheatbelt</strong><br />

No. <strong>of</strong> farms no. 578 144 144<br />

Farm size ha 3397 6336 1825<br />

Cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity % 51 49 72<br />

Equity3 % 84 98 63<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> owner yrs 43 53 38<br />

Farm cash <strong>in</strong>come4 $'000 132 277 42<br />

Disposable family <strong>in</strong>come $'000 82 141 –3<br />

Farm bus<strong>in</strong>ess pr<strong>of</strong>it5 $'000 39 181 –61<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> return6 b. Northern <strong>Wheatbelt</strong><br />

% 5.3 10.3 –3.8<br />

No <strong>of</strong> farms no. 875 219 219<br />

Farm size ha 3108 2939 3675<br />

Cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity % 50 64 37<br />

Equity3 % 82 72 70<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> owner yrs 43 53 38<br />

Farm cash <strong>in</strong>come4 $'000 161 292 17<br />

Disposable family <strong>in</strong>come $'000 97 272 0<br />

Farm bus<strong>in</strong>ess pr<strong>of</strong>it5 $'000 65 245 –107<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> return6 c. Central <strong>Wheatbelt</strong><br />

% 4.7 12.7 –2.9<br />

No <strong>of</strong> farms no. 3920 980 980<br />

Farm size ha 1871 2863 700<br />

Cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity % 45 55 30<br />

Equity3 % 83 82 94<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> owner yrs 50 47 57<br />

Farm cash <strong>in</strong>come4 $'000 93 197 23<br />

Disposable family <strong>in</strong>come $'000 57 106 33<br />

Farm bus<strong>in</strong>ess pr<strong>of</strong>it5 $'000 22 127 –45<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> return6 d. South Coast <strong>Wheatbelt</strong><br />

% 2.9 8.3 –3.7<br />

No <strong>of</strong> farms no. 461 115 115<br />

Farm size ha 2508 2553 3185<br />

Cropp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>tensity % 43 61 33<br />

Equity3 % 58 58 52<br />

Age <strong>of</strong> owner yrs 41 35 33<br />

Farm cash <strong>in</strong>come4 $'000 68 212 –39<br />

Disposable family <strong>in</strong>come $'000 50 145 35<br />

Farm bus<strong>in</strong>ess pr<strong>of</strong>it5 $'000 4 101 –91<br />

Rate <strong>of</strong> return6 % 4.0 8.5 –0.7<br />

1. ABARE 1998, 2000<br />

2. Farms were ranked by their rate <strong>of</strong> return to capital<br />

3. Equity =((owned farm capital – liabilities)/owned farm capital) x 100<br />

4. Farm cash <strong>in</strong>come = total cash receipts – total cash costs<br />

5. Farm bus<strong>in</strong>ess pr<strong>of</strong>it = farm cash <strong>in</strong>come + changes <strong>in</strong> trad<strong>in</strong>g stocks – depreciation – imputed cost <strong>of</strong><br />

family labour<br />

6. Rate <strong>of</strong> return = (pr<strong>of</strong>it at full equity / total open<strong>in</strong>g capital) x 100 (where pr<strong>of</strong>it at full equity = farm<br />

bus<strong>in</strong>ess pr<strong>of</strong>it + rent + <strong>in</strong>terest and f<strong>in</strong>ance lease payments – depreciation on leased items (i.e. pr<strong>of</strong>it at<br />

full equity considers the case where the farmer fully owned all the capital used <strong>in</strong> his/her farm bus<strong>in</strong>ess)<br />

– 3 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!