07.04.2013 Views

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>with</strong> Sal<strong>in</strong>ity <strong>in</strong> <strong>Wheatbelt</strong> <strong>Valleys</strong> Conference<br />

<strong>Deal<strong>in</strong>g</strong><br />

Prospects and Practical Options<br />

Processes,<br />

Options<br />

The majority <strong>of</strong> people attend<strong>in</strong>g the conference agreed that the options for deal<strong>in</strong>g <strong>with</strong> <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> are currently<br />

available, and the proportion <strong>of</strong> people hold<strong>in</strong>g this sentiment <strong>in</strong>creased by 10 per cent by the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

conference (see figure below).<br />

Limitations<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> people<br />

70<br />

60<br />

50<br />

40<br />

30<br />

20<br />

10<br />

0<br />

Strongly<br />

agree<br />

Agree Disagree Strongly<br />

disagree<br />

Response<br />

Don’t know<br />

Before<br />

The results graphed below show that the costs <strong>of</strong> implementation are the greatest deterrent to the uptake <strong>of</strong><br />

suitable options for <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong>. This is closely followed by uncerta<strong>in</strong> outcomes. Factors that were the least<br />

limit<strong>in</strong>g were local support and government regulation. Less people believed that <strong>in</strong>sufficient government<br />

assistance was a limit<strong>in</strong>g factor at the end <strong>of</strong> the conference (50% <strong>in</strong> the first survey; 31% <strong>in</strong> second<br />

survey). 1<br />

Percent <strong>of</strong> people<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Question 2.1 The options for tackl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> <strong>in</strong> wheatbelt valleys are<br />

currently available.<br />

Question 2.1 What are the major limitations to the uptake <strong>of</strong> suitable<br />

options for <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> <strong>in</strong> wheatbelt valleys?<br />

Costs <strong>of</strong><br />

implementation<br />

Uncerta<strong>in</strong><br />

outcomes<br />

Insufficient<br />

technical<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation<br />

Low level <strong>of</strong><br />

local support<br />

Response<br />

1 Respondents had the option <strong>of</strong> choos<strong>in</strong>g more than one limit<strong>in</strong>g factor. Therefore, percentages<br />

for the six options do not collectively add up to 100 per cent.<br />

Government<br />

regulation<br />

Insufficient<br />

government<br />

assistance<br />

After<br />

Before<br />

After

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!