Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Morrell, Hatton and Curry<br />
GROUNDWATER MODELLING DISCUSSION<br />
Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the FLOWTUBE and HARSD<br />
modell<strong>in</strong>g, the follow<strong>in</strong>g prelim<strong>in</strong>ary conclusions<br />
were drawn:<br />
• Recharge takes place over most <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catchment (although higher <strong>in</strong> some places) and<br />
most <strong>of</strong> the groundwater discharge ends up <strong>in</strong><br />
the lake areas.<br />
• Most <strong>of</strong> the catchment (50%) will be at risk <strong>of</strong><br />
shallow water tables <strong>in</strong> the next 20–40 years.<br />
The water levels <strong>in</strong> the unconf<strong>in</strong>ed and perched<br />
aquifers can only be controlled by reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />
recharge through better agronomic<br />
management. If the recharge rate can be<br />
reduced to 10 mm yr –1 , the area affected by<br />
<strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> will be reduced to less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the<br />
total catchment area after 40 years.<br />
• The predictive scenario modell<strong>in</strong>g showed that<br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g recharge by 90% will be effective <strong>in</strong><br />
reduc<strong>in</strong>g the water levels to several metres<br />
below the surface <strong>in</strong> most parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catchment, especially <strong>in</strong> the high recharge areas.<br />
However, due to the gradients that have been<br />
created s<strong>in</strong>ce clear<strong>in</strong>g, groundwater discharge<br />
will cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> the lower areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catchments for a very long time.<br />
• Although surface and groundwater discharge can<br />
be greatly reduced by plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> trees, water<br />
level rises <strong>in</strong> cleared areas <strong>of</strong> the catchment will<br />
not be greatly affected and the process <strong>of</strong><br />
sal<strong>in</strong>isation <strong>in</strong> the other parts <strong>of</strong> the catchment<br />
will cont<strong>in</strong>ue largely unabated for a long period<br />
<strong>of</strong> time.<br />
Table 2: Land Monitor Statistics<br />
Non-Affected Land 72.6%<br />
Perennial Veg 12.1%<br />
Salt Affected 1987–91 9.8%<br />
Salt Affected 1994–97 1.6%<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Salt affected area 11.4%<br />
Lakes 3.9%<br />
– 12 –<br />
ASSESSMENT OF SALINITY MANAGEMENT<br />
OPTIONS<br />
Sal<strong>in</strong>ity management options generally consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />
• Recharge reduction;<br />
• Groundwater pump<strong>in</strong>g and dra<strong>in</strong>age to lower<br />
water tables ;<br />
• Management <strong>of</strong> the sal<strong>in</strong>e land; and/or<br />
• Status quo.<br />
Recharge reduction<br />
The discharge capacity for the deep groundwater<br />
systems is estimated to be equivalent to 1–5 mm/yr<br />
recharge (i.e. the recharge under native vegetation).<br />
The deep dra<strong>in</strong>age under most cropp<strong>in</strong>g/pasture<br />
agronomic systems generally exceeds that for native<br />
vegetation and hence will <strong>in</strong>evitably lead to ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />
water tables and <strong>in</strong>creased land sal<strong>in</strong>isation. Hence,<br />
as long as agriculture occurs <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> the catchment,<br />
we would expect <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> to also occur.<br />
Recharge control is unlikely to reverse groundwater<br />
trends <strong>in</strong> the foreseeable future. It has been shown<br />
that a large reduction <strong>in</strong> recharge is required to<br />
reduce the subsurface lateral flow to the numerous<br />
lakes. Even if this is achieved, due to the sluggish<br />
gradients and the non-flush<strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>of</strong> the system,<br />
the <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> already developed <strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />
catchment will be difficult to reduce. In nearly all<br />
wheatbelt catchments for most years ra<strong>in</strong>fall exceeds<br />
the amount <strong>of</strong> water that can be used by the w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />
cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems and annual pastures. As well as<br />
<strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g deep dra<strong>in</strong>age and recharge, this can result<br />
<strong>in</strong> waterlogg<strong>in</strong>g which affects crop performance.<br />
There are three management strategies that can<br />
reduce excess water under w<strong>in</strong>ter crops. The first is<br />
to ensure the crops have adequate nutrition. The<br />
second is to plant the w<strong>in</strong>ter crops <strong>in</strong>to drier soil.<br />
Annual pastures can create such a buffer on the deep<br />
duplex soil but not on the shallow duplex soil.<br />
Lucerne can create a dry soil buffer that essentially