07.04.2013 Views

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Morrell, Hatton and Curry<br />

GROUNDWATER MODELLING DISCUSSION<br />

Based on the results <strong>of</strong> the FLOWTUBE and HARSD<br />

modell<strong>in</strong>g, the follow<strong>in</strong>g prelim<strong>in</strong>ary conclusions<br />

were drawn:<br />

• Recharge takes place over most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catchment (although higher <strong>in</strong> some places) and<br />

most <strong>of</strong> the groundwater discharge ends up <strong>in</strong><br />

the lake areas.<br />

• Most <strong>of</strong> the catchment (50%) will be at risk <strong>of</strong><br />

shallow water tables <strong>in</strong> the next 20–40 years.<br />

The water levels <strong>in</strong> the unconf<strong>in</strong>ed and perched<br />

aquifers can only be controlled by reduc<strong>in</strong>g<br />

recharge through better agronomic<br />

management. If the recharge rate can be<br />

reduced to 10 mm yr –1 , the area affected by<br />

<strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> will be reduced to less than 20% <strong>of</strong> the<br />

total catchment area after 40 years.<br />

• The predictive scenario modell<strong>in</strong>g showed that<br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g recharge by 90% will be effective <strong>in</strong><br />

reduc<strong>in</strong>g the water levels to several metres<br />

below the surface <strong>in</strong> most parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catchment, especially <strong>in</strong> the high recharge areas.<br />

However, due to the gradients that have been<br />

created s<strong>in</strong>ce clear<strong>in</strong>g, groundwater discharge<br />

will cont<strong>in</strong>ue <strong>in</strong> the lower areas <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catchments for a very long time.<br />

• Although surface and groundwater discharge can<br />

be greatly reduced by plant<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> trees, water<br />

level rises <strong>in</strong> cleared areas <strong>of</strong> the catchment will<br />

not be greatly affected and the process <strong>of</strong><br />

sal<strong>in</strong>isation <strong>in</strong> the other parts <strong>of</strong> the catchment<br />

will cont<strong>in</strong>ue largely unabated for a long period<br />

<strong>of</strong> time.<br />

Table 2: Land Monitor Statistics<br />

Non-Affected Land 72.6%<br />

Perennial Veg 12.1%<br />

Salt Affected 1987–91 9.8%<br />

Salt Affected 1994–97 1.6%<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong>ed Salt affected area 11.4%<br />

Lakes 3.9%<br />

– 12 –<br />

ASSESSMENT OF SALINITY MANAGEMENT<br />

OPTIONS<br />

Sal<strong>in</strong>ity management options generally consist <strong>of</strong>:<br />

• Recharge reduction;<br />

• Groundwater pump<strong>in</strong>g and dra<strong>in</strong>age to lower<br />

water tables ;<br />

• Management <strong>of</strong> the sal<strong>in</strong>e land; and/or<br />

• Status quo.<br />

Recharge reduction<br />

The discharge capacity for the deep groundwater<br />

systems is estimated to be equivalent to 1–5 mm/yr<br />

recharge (i.e. the recharge under native vegetation).<br />

The deep dra<strong>in</strong>age under most cropp<strong>in</strong>g/pasture<br />

agronomic systems generally exceeds that for native<br />

vegetation and hence will <strong>in</strong>evitably lead to ris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

water tables and <strong>in</strong>creased land sal<strong>in</strong>isation. Hence,<br />

as long as agriculture occurs <strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> the catchment,<br />

we would expect <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> to also occur.<br />

Recharge control is unlikely to reverse groundwater<br />

trends <strong>in</strong> the foreseeable future. It has been shown<br />

that a large reduction <strong>in</strong> recharge is required to<br />

reduce the subsurface lateral flow to the numerous<br />

lakes. Even if this is achieved, due to the sluggish<br />

gradients and the non-flush<strong>in</strong>g capacity <strong>of</strong> the system,<br />

the <strong>sal<strong>in</strong>ity</strong> already developed <strong>in</strong> some <strong>of</strong> parts <strong>of</strong> the<br />

catchment will be difficult to reduce. In nearly all<br />

wheatbelt catchments for most years ra<strong>in</strong>fall exceeds<br />

the amount <strong>of</strong> water that can be used by the w<strong>in</strong>ter<br />

cropp<strong>in</strong>g systems and annual pastures. As well as<br />

<strong>in</strong>duc<strong>in</strong>g deep dra<strong>in</strong>age and recharge, this can result<br />

<strong>in</strong> waterlogg<strong>in</strong>g which affects crop performance.<br />

There are three management strategies that can<br />

reduce excess water under w<strong>in</strong>ter crops. The first is<br />

to ensure the crops have adequate nutrition. The<br />

second is to plant the w<strong>in</strong>ter crops <strong>in</strong>to drier soil.<br />

Annual pastures can create such a buffer on the deep<br />

duplex soil but not on the shallow duplex soil.<br />

Lucerne can create a dry soil buffer that essentially

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!