Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
Dealing with salinity in Wheatbelt Valleys - Department of Water
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Wallace<br />
Current and Proposed Management Actions<br />
Recovery actions to protect the Lake are divided <strong>in</strong>to<br />
two types. Firstly, those that are required <strong>in</strong> the<br />
short to medium term to protect it aga<strong>in</strong>st<br />
catchment conditions that will <strong>in</strong>evitably worsen.<br />
These emergency actions partly disconnect, <strong>in</strong> a<br />
hydrological sense, the Lake from its catchment, but<br />
they are less practicable <strong>in</strong> the longer term. The<br />
emergency actions are a temporary (20-30 years)<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g solution, and they would be expensive to<br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong> and expand <strong>in</strong> a catchment that will, if left<br />
untreated, become <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gly sal<strong>in</strong>e. Emergency<br />
actions are necessary to buy time for more<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able actions to take effect.<br />
Table 1: Actions required to recover Toolib<strong>in</strong> Lake. The same actions, if successfully implemented, will prevent<br />
further deterioration <strong>of</strong> farmland values, and recover some <strong>of</strong> the losses. Actions that have been started are<br />
marked <strong>with</strong> a s<strong>in</strong>gle asterisk (*), started and partially completed are marked (**), and completed actions are<br />
marked (***).<br />
Short term, emergency<br />
actions<br />
Long term actions for<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>able Lake and<br />
catchment<br />
Actions for<br />
communication and<br />
<strong>in</strong>tegration<br />
Lake and immediate environs Catchment<br />
1. Divert low volume, highly sal<strong>in</strong>e surface<br />
flows around the Lake***<br />
2. Lower sal<strong>in</strong>e groundwaters beneath the<br />
Lake by use <strong>of</strong> groundwater pumps*<br />
3. Revegetate cleared areas adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Lake to help lower watertable beneath<br />
the Lake**<br />
1. Revegetate degraded sections <strong>of</strong> floor <strong>of</strong><br />
the Lake and areas disturbed by<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g works.<br />
2. Revegetate cleared and disturbed areas<br />
<strong>with</strong><strong>in</strong> conservation lands adjo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the<br />
Lake**<br />
3. Regenerate, for example, by us<strong>in</strong>g fire,<br />
those plant communities identified for<br />
management.<br />
1. Enhance dra<strong>in</strong>age <strong>of</strong> flats immediately to<br />
the north <strong>of</strong> the Lake to prevent recharge<br />
<strong>of</strong> the flats <strong>with</strong> consequent sal<strong>in</strong>isation <strong>of</strong><br />
flats, loss <strong>of</strong> agricultural land and<br />
detrimental effects on the Lake**<br />
2. Revegetate areas <strong>of</strong> major recharge <strong>in</strong> the<br />
catchment, for example, deep sands**<br />
3. Revegetate and stabilise discharge areas,<br />
for example, along dra<strong>in</strong>age l<strong>in</strong>es**<br />
4. Protect remnant vegetation to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />
its evapotranspiration and other water<br />
management capabilities**<br />
1. Agronomic practices adopted that<br />
significantly <strong>in</strong>crease water use, land<br />
conservation and farm pr<strong>of</strong>itability*<br />
2. Revegetation across the landscape,<br />
perhaps <strong>in</strong> alley farm<strong>in</strong>g configurations.<br />
This vegetation, together <strong>with</strong> other<br />
practices, ensures that recharge to<br />
groundwaters are negligible, or at a level<br />
counterbalanced by discharge that does<br />
not affect the Lake or agricultural areas.<br />
Such a system will require new<br />
agrisystems to be developed based on<br />
woody vegetation. These systems must<br />
be economically viable*<br />
1. Formation <strong>of</strong> an effective Toolib<strong>in</strong> Catchment Group and, as necessary, sub-groups. All<br />
land managers and other stakeholders <strong>in</strong>volved***<br />
2. Formation <strong>of</strong> an effective Recovery Team and associated Technical Advisory Group to<br />
guide management <strong>of</strong> the Lake***<br />
3. Agencies and non-government fund<strong>in</strong>g bodies, such as Alcoa <strong>of</strong> Australia, to ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong><br />
effective l<strong>in</strong>es <strong>of</strong> communication <strong>with</strong> each other and land managers outside the operations<br />
<strong>of</strong> (1) and (2), although the latter are primary means <strong>of</strong> liaison and <strong>in</strong>formation flow***<br />
– 4 –