09.04.2013 Views

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.4.1.3.13: Small tanged biface (see Figure 5.2 #34). This type was made from a small<br />

nodule-reduction flake or a large biface-thinning flake. It was reduced by pressure, and<br />

was finished with pressure. It is 8 cm or less in length. <strong>The</strong> stem was finely chipped by<br />

pressure. A thin, lenticular cross section was the desired result <strong>of</strong> the reduction process.<br />

This form was not found in general excav<strong>at</strong>ions <strong>at</strong> <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong>, but notched,<br />

eccentric versions were found in cache contexts. It is similar to the stemmed biface,<br />

except for the tangs (i.e., overhanging shoulders), and also for its smaller size. Clark and<br />

Bryant (1991) have conducted the most thorough study <strong>of</strong> this projectile point type from<br />

Yerba Buena, Chiapas, Mexico.<br />

<strong>The</strong> small tanged biface type generally is not common in the Maya lowlands, and<br />

many examples are from Early Classic contexts. It is possible th<strong>at</strong> the trend <strong>of</strong> tanged-<br />

biface manufacture was adopted from Central Mexico, and Maya examples may have<br />

been produced to emul<strong>at</strong>e imported, tanged obsidian-bifaces. Imported Mexican points<br />

found <strong>at</strong> Uaxactun (Kidder 1947:Figure 64a), Tikal, and other sites were made with a<br />

transverse parallel pressure-flaking technique not common to the Maya Lowlands. At<br />

<strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong>, a few obsidian bifaces were reduced by pressure flaking in a transverse-<br />

parallel style, a marker <strong>of</strong> Central Mexican lithic technology. However, the lack <strong>of</strong> distal<br />

portions <strong>of</strong> these bifaces makes it impossible to determine if they were tanged. <strong>The</strong><br />

obsidian points, like their chert counterparts from the Maya area, probably were <strong>at</strong>l<strong>at</strong>l<br />

dart points. <strong>The</strong> symbolic potency <strong>of</strong> the tanged dart-point for the Maya seems to have<br />

been gre<strong>at</strong>, because <strong>of</strong> their inclusion and repetition in many ritual cache contexts from<br />

<strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> and other major Maya sites (Figure 3.2). <strong>The</strong> lack <strong>of</strong> tanged bifaces in the<br />

187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!