09.04.2013 Views

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

made from microcrystalline quartz, and also in the production <strong>of</strong> obsidian bifaces for<br />

royal cache deposits.<br />

Although there is a high probability <strong>of</strong> different procurement str<strong>at</strong>egies for locally<br />

or regionally available m<strong>at</strong>erials versus purely imported ones, they were used in some<br />

similar ways. Obsidian and microcrystalline quartz crosscut elite and nonelite contexts in<br />

use, as cutting and scraping tools and as ceremonial goods. Both also were reduced using<br />

a combin<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> percussion and pressure techniques, which may have placed them in<br />

similar emic c<strong>at</strong>egories for the knappers and the consumers <strong>of</strong> the finished products. It<br />

should also be noted, however, th<strong>at</strong> obsidian and microcrystalline quartzes were<br />

symbolically distinct throughout the history <strong>of</strong> the Maya world and, as previously<br />

mentioned, they were reduced in different ways. This idea is supported by the use <strong>of</strong><br />

obsidian and flint oppositions in the caches <strong>at</strong> <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> and elsewhere in the Maya<br />

area. Thus, part <strong>of</strong> this research can address the problem <strong>of</strong> the division <strong>of</strong> labor based on<br />

m<strong>at</strong>erial, technology, and loc<strong>at</strong>ion by isol<strong>at</strong>ing the degree to which different m<strong>at</strong>erials<br />

were reduced independently <strong>of</strong> one another by one or more groups <strong>of</strong> stone workers (see<br />

Hypothesis 2 below).<br />

I make distinctions between all technologies and forms (both “utilitarian” and<br />

“ceremonial”), because it is precisely the broad archaeological c<strong>at</strong>egory <strong>of</strong> “chipped-<br />

stone producer” th<strong>at</strong> is one <strong>of</strong> the main foci <strong>of</strong> this study. If rel<strong>at</strong>ively large amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

microcrystalline quartz and obsidian debitage come from one particular household group,<br />

it is impossible to determine if th<strong>at</strong> household group housed a “jack-<strong>of</strong>-all-trades” stone<br />

worker, or a number <strong>of</strong> culturally distinct kinds <strong>of</strong> craft specialists. On the other hand, if<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!