09.04.2013 Views

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

historical connection to previous inhabitants <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> was. It is possible th<strong>at</strong><br />

some <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> families with a long history <strong>of</strong> living in the city maintained their<br />

households, and, thus, may not be properly characterized as “squ<strong>at</strong>ters” (cf. Muñoz and<br />

Golden 2005).<br />

7.2.1.2: Obsidian distributional d<strong>at</strong>a. <strong>The</strong> obsidian production evidence from the<br />

acropolis group came almost entirely from the PN46 excav<strong>at</strong>ions. No significant evidence<br />

<strong>of</strong> production was found in PN11, and PN54, which had a small lithic sample, did not<br />

produce a full range <strong>of</strong> production debitage. PN 46, however, fe<strong>at</strong>ures a rel<strong>at</strong>ively<br />

substantial obsidian artifact sample, which d<strong>at</strong>es to the Yaxche and Chacalhaaz phases.<br />

<strong>The</strong> residential group <strong>of</strong> the PN46 excav<strong>at</strong>ions was an obsidian-blade producer from the<br />

Yaxche to the Chacalhaaz phase, but not into the Kumche phase. <strong>The</strong>y were using<br />

obsidian on the acropolis, however, until the site was abandoned (Muñoz and Golden<br />

2005).<br />

<strong>The</strong> second sp<strong>at</strong>ial group, residential groups in the city center, also contains<br />

evidence <strong>of</strong> the production <strong>of</strong> obsidian goods. In the northern portion <strong>of</strong> the site, PN26<br />

and PN41 fe<strong>at</strong>ure little obsidian-blade production evidence. PN26, which only was not<br />

thoroughly excav<strong>at</strong>ed, appears to have been a possible production locale during the<br />

Chacalhaaz phase, but there are too few obsidian artifacts to st<strong>at</strong>e this with confidence.<br />

PN 41 yielded a rel<strong>at</strong>ively large number <strong>of</strong> obsidian artifacts, especially during the<br />

Chacalhaaz phase, but the lack <strong>of</strong> much production debitage make it unclear whether this<br />

residential group was involved in blade production. If blade production did occur here, it<br />

272

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!