09.04.2013 Views

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

temples in the West Group Plaza, which foreshadowed the architectural construction<br />

p<strong>at</strong>terns <strong>of</strong> his children (Houston et al. 2001).<br />

According to Muñoz (2001:Section 04), <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> ceramic change during<br />

Balche times “appear[s] to be the result <strong>of</strong> diversific<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> vessel form and decor<strong>at</strong>ive<br />

modes as influence from the Central Petén wanes and <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> begins to develop<br />

into the primary site and major political power for the region.” While this is the case for<br />

the ceramic traditions <strong>of</strong> <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong>, lithic and technological d<strong>at</strong>a suggest th<strong>at</strong> there<br />

was an intense and close rel<strong>at</strong>ionship with the Central Petén during and after the Balche<br />

phase. Microcrystalline quartz and obsidian eccentrics from <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> resemble<br />

those from Tikal. In some cases they are symbolically and technologically identical to<br />

Tikal eccentrics, including stylistic details. Although <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong> may have been<br />

autonomous with respect to lithic traditions during the Early Classic, Tikal and Uaxactun<br />

must have directly influenced their L<strong>at</strong>e Classic caching practices during the “hi<strong>at</strong>us”<br />

period.<br />

<strong>The</strong> style and placement <strong>of</strong> stelae during the L<strong>at</strong>e Classic period indic<strong>at</strong>e th<strong>at</strong> the<br />

figures on these monuments were meant to address the public, perhaps as effigies. Ruler<br />

2, Ruler 3, Ruler 4, and probably Ruler 5, Ruler 6 ( Ha’ K’in Xok) and Ruler 7 all erected<br />

their stelae in front <strong>of</strong> the burial mounds <strong>of</strong> their f<strong>at</strong>hers. In the case <strong>of</strong> R-5, Ruler 2<br />

placed his monuments in front <strong>of</strong> the probable tomb <strong>of</strong> Ruler 1. <strong>The</strong> monuments erected<br />

for Ruler 1also are in the South Group suggesting th<strong>at</strong> his ancestors, or de facto<br />

ancestors, had made pyramids and had been buried in th<strong>at</strong> same spot (<strong>Stone</strong> 1989). Ruler<br />

2 made the South Group even more personal, however, by placing his stelae in plain view<br />

69

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!