09.04.2013 Views

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

anywhere from one to twenty years apart. In other words, they were not simultaneous<br />

caching events and the eccentrics probably were not made <strong>at</strong> the same time. <strong>The</strong>se caches<br />

were part <strong>of</strong> an obsidian eccentric tradition th<strong>at</strong> extended from the reign <strong>of</strong> Ruler 1 to th<strong>at</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Ruler 4 (A.D. 605-757). Although Early Classic obsidians were unifacially notched,<br />

they do not adhere to the same formal outline as those from the early L<strong>at</strong>e Classic, and<br />

those from Ruler 5 to Ruler 7 (i.e., A.D. 757-808; rulers who were responsible for the<br />

construction <strong>of</strong> the l<strong>at</strong>er phases <strong>of</strong> Temple O-13) use a similar symbolic form, but were<br />

made largely from exhausted cores; a tradition less common during the middle period<br />

(A.D. 605-757). It may be possible th<strong>at</strong> the obsidian eccentrics made from A.D. 605 to<br />

757 were manufactured by a few local knappers who passed their knowledge down<br />

through three or four gener<strong>at</strong>ions. Given the similarity to obsidian eccentrics from Tikal<br />

(Figure 7.12), it is possible th<strong>at</strong> the cre<strong>at</strong>ion and use <strong>of</strong> this style was not an<br />

autochthonous development.<br />

Although formal and technological similarities exist between all caches during the<br />

Yaxche phase <strong>at</strong> <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong>, the two caches from R-5 provide an excellent test case<br />

with which to compare two almost identical groups <strong>of</strong> obsidian eccentrics. <strong>The</strong> first<br />

cache, R-5-4, is a substela cache <strong>of</strong> Stela 37 (early seventh century) th<strong>at</strong> was deposited in<br />

a limestone cist loc<strong>at</strong>ed behind the support-shaft <strong>of</strong> the stela. <strong>The</strong> second cache, R-5-6,<br />

was deposited around a cylindrical column altar loc<strong>at</strong>ed to the side <strong>of</strong> Stela 37 in the<br />

same northeast pl<strong>at</strong>form <strong>of</strong> R-5. Even though the contexts are different and there is<br />

vari<strong>at</strong>ion between the deposition style and th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> nonobsidian cache goods, for unknown<br />

reasons, the symbolic forms <strong>of</strong> the obsidians are repe<strong>at</strong>ed. <strong>The</strong> first clear difference<br />

294

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!