09.04.2013 Views

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

The Organization of Chipped-Stone Economies at Piedras Negras ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

chipped stone, and also the religious and ritual component th<strong>at</strong> may have accompanied it,<br />

especially in the production <strong>of</strong> eccentrics for royal consumption. Consequently, Section<br />

2.2 outlines some definitions <strong>of</strong> world view and ideology used in anthropological and<br />

archaeological liter<strong>at</strong>ure and how those might be connected to craft production.<br />

Before we depart into a discussion <strong>of</strong> the role <strong>of</strong> ideas and symbols in the<br />

organiz<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> production <strong>at</strong> <strong>Piedras</strong> <strong>Negras</strong>, I take issue with a few basic concepts used<br />

in the past by McAnany (1989; 1992a; 1992b; 1995). My intention is to show how many<br />

<strong>of</strong> the concepts she has used throughout her public<strong>at</strong>ion history are used differently in this<br />

study. First, she viewed Classic Maya society as a two-class system, which is not<br />

necessarily a demonstr<strong>at</strong>ed fact <strong>of</strong> ancient Maya social organiz<strong>at</strong>ion (see Chase and<br />

Chase 1992). <strong>The</strong> concepts <strong>of</strong> elite and nonelite (i.e., the upper- and under-class) are<br />

loosely used without providing a firm definition and archaeological corollary to illustr<strong>at</strong>e<br />

this basic distinction. I am not criticizing class analysis here, but r<strong>at</strong>her am pointing out<br />

th<strong>at</strong> the elite/nonelite dichotomy is difficult to apply to all Maya centers, especially since<br />

they vary widely in size and political organiz<strong>at</strong>ion through time and over space.<br />

However, I do not <strong>of</strong>fer a better framework for c<strong>at</strong>egorizing st<strong>at</strong>us here. Here I avoid<br />

using the elite to nonelite distinction as much as possible, by focusing on the royal family<br />

as a distinct social group, which contrasts with the rest <strong>of</strong> the popul<strong>at</strong>ion. I do not make<br />

any outright assumptions about the compar<strong>at</strong>ive wealth or st<strong>at</strong>us <strong>of</strong> the residing<br />

popul<strong>at</strong>ion. This distinction has the effect <strong>of</strong> bringing the analytical focus on the ruling<br />

elite to the household level, and as one <strong>of</strong> many players in ancient Maya society. It also<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!