10.04.2013 Views

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

4. <strong>The</strong> Rise and Fall of the Contrastive Hierarchy<br />

4.1. Introduction: Jakobson and his collaborators<br />

<strong>The</strong> work of Roman Jakobson and his colleagues merits a separate discussion.<br />

Many of the ma<strong>in</strong> ideas <strong>in</strong> Trubetzkoy’s Gründzuge were worked out <strong>in</strong><br />

collaboration with Jakobson. To Jakobson is due the notion of the dist<strong>in</strong>ctive<br />

feature. Whereas Trubetzkoy allowed features to be gradual (multi-valued),<br />

Jakobson eventually proposed that all features are b<strong>in</strong>ary. <strong>The</strong> notion that<br />

language and cognition crucially <strong>in</strong>volve b<strong>in</strong>ary dichotomies became central to<br />

Jakobson’s th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g , and this idea was later taken over <strong>in</strong>to generative<br />

<strong>phonology</strong>.<br />

In the 1950s and early 1960s, Roman Jakobson, Morris Halle, and their<br />

colleagues wrote a series of publications that laid the groundwork for the next<br />

phase of dist<strong>in</strong>ctive feature theory and what eventually became the theory of<br />

generative <strong>phonology</strong>. Much critical attention, then and afterwards, was directed<br />

at various aspects of their theory that struck observers as be<strong>in</strong>g the most<br />

controversial and <strong>in</strong>novative, such as the nature of dist<strong>in</strong>ctive features, the<br />

relation of phonemes to allophones, and the organization of the grammar.<br />

What is of greatest <strong>in</strong>terest for our present purposes is an aspect of their<br />

work that attracted relatively less attention. This is their development and<br />

utilization of a <strong>contrastive</strong> <strong>hierarchy</strong> of dist<strong>in</strong>ctive features. We have seen that<br />

such a <strong>hierarchy</strong> is already implicit <strong>in</strong> much of Trubetzkoy 1939, and it could be<br />

that this was one source of the idea. It also fits well with Jakobson’s general<br />

119

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!