10.04.2013 Views

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>in</strong> the low vowels (0.11121). <strong>The</strong>se precedence relations are meant to account for<br />

why /i, a, u/ is a typical vowel <strong>in</strong>ventory, but /i, Q, A/ and /i, y, a/ are not.<br />

(4.2) Predicted acquisition sequences (Jakobson and Halle, 1956: 41)<br />

Consonants: dental vs. labial ..... 0.1<br />

Vowels: narrow vs. wide ..... 0.11<br />

Narrow vowels: palatal vs. velar ..... 0.111<br />

Wide vowels: palatal vs. velar ..... 0.1111<br />

Narrow palatal vowels: rounded vs. unrounded ..... 0.1112<br />

Wide palatal vowels: rounded vs. unrounded ..... 0.11121<br />

Velar vowels: unrounded vs. rounded ..... 0.1113<br />

Consonants: velopalatal vs. labial and dental ..... 0.112<br />

Consonants: palatal vs. velar ..... 0.1121<br />

Consonants: rounded vs. unrounded or<br />

pharyngealized vs. non-pharyngealized ..... 0.1122<br />

Consonants: palatalized vs. non-palatalized ..... 0.1123<br />

By the same token, (4.20 predicts that the first contrast to be established <strong>in</strong><br />

a phonological system is between dental and labial consonants (e.g. /t/~ /k/).<br />

<strong>The</strong> next consonantal contrast adds a velopalatal consonant (e.g. /k/). This<br />

contrast (0.112) is predicted to follow the acquisition of contrast (0.11), s<strong>in</strong>ce 0.11<br />

is conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 0.112, but no implicational relation is predicted to hold between it<br />

and contrast 0.111, s<strong>in</strong>ce 0.111 is not conta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> 0.112. <strong>The</strong>re is no significance<br />

to the fact that one decimal is a smaller number than the other; thus, the chart <strong>in</strong><br />

(4.2) is equivalent to the branch<strong>in</strong>g tree diagram <strong>in</strong> (4.3).<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!