10.04.2013 Views

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.3. Trubetzkoy: A theory of oppositions<br />

<strong>The</strong> phonologist who did the most to develop the pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of contrast as an<br />

organiz<strong>in</strong>g pr<strong>in</strong>ciple of <strong>phonology</strong> was N. S. Trubetzkoy. His Grundzüge der<br />

Phonologie, written <strong>in</strong> the 1930s, is a major statement of the Prague School<br />

approach to <strong>phonology</strong>. In this work, Trubetzkoy’s aim is to present an<br />

exhaustive account of the various types of <strong>contrastive</strong> oppositions that can exist<br />

<strong>in</strong> a phonological system. <strong>The</strong> <strong>in</strong>fluence of his approach can be found <strong>in</strong> many<br />

subsequent schools of l<strong>in</strong>guistics. <strong>The</strong>refore, Trubetzkoy’s approach to contrast is<br />

central to our <strong>in</strong>vestigation.<br />

Trubetzkoy made major contributions to our understand<strong>in</strong>g of how<br />

contrast functions <strong>in</strong> phonological systems. One of his key <strong>in</strong>sights is that the<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ation of <strong>contrastive</strong> features <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>ventory is not self-evident but must<br />

be established by the analyst on the basis of the pattern<strong>in</strong>g of the phonological<br />

system. I will also show that the notion of feature <strong>hierarchy</strong> as a way to depict<br />

<strong>contrastive</strong> relations makes an appearance —perhaps its earliest appearance — <strong>in</strong><br />

the Grundzüge. However, his account of <strong>contrastive</strong> relations is crucially<br />

<strong>in</strong>complete, because it is not explicit with respect to how contrasts are assigned.<br />

More than that, I will show that Trubetzkoy (1939) does not follow a consistent<br />

approach to contrast, but varies between the pairwise approach and feature<br />

order<strong>in</strong>g. <strong>The</strong> former predom<strong>in</strong>ates <strong>in</strong> the earlier parts of the book, where the<br />

discussion tends to be abstract and ma<strong>in</strong>ly theoretical, with no direct empirical<br />

consequences. In later sections, where Trubetzkoy has empirical evidence for<br />

67

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!