10.04.2013 Views

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>The</strong> only m<strong>in</strong>imal pairs are {i, e} and {o, u}; the features [back] and [round]<br />

double each other for every vowel except /a/, mak<strong>in</strong>g each other logically<br />

redundant, but not leav<strong>in</strong>g beh<strong>in</strong>d enough features to make a contrast between<br />

/i, u/ and /e, o/, and leav<strong>in</strong>g /a/ without any <strong>contrastive</strong> feature.<br />

<strong>The</strong> same po<strong>in</strong>t applies a fortiori with the simple three-vowel system /i, a,<br />

u/. If we conf<strong>in</strong>e ourselves to two features, say [high] and [round], the vowels<br />

fall <strong>in</strong>to m<strong>in</strong>imal pairs and the pairwise method can assign them dist<strong>in</strong>ct<br />

representations.<br />

(2.20) Three-vowel system, features [high], [round]<br />

a. Full specifications<br />

i a u<br />

high + – +<br />

round – – +<br />

b. Specifications accord<strong>in</strong>g to the pairwise method<br />

i a u M<strong>in</strong>imal pairs<br />

high + – {i, a}<br />

round – + {a, u}<br />

Add<strong>in</strong>g one more feature, say [back], wipes out the m<strong>in</strong>imal pairs (2.21),<br />

caus<strong>in</strong>g the pairwise method to fail to dist<strong>in</strong>guish them.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!