10.04.2013 Views

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

The contrastive hierarchy in phonology 2009 Dresher.pdf - CUNY ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(5.22) Spanish: /e/ is unspecified (Archangeli 1984)<br />

a. Full specifications b. Remov<strong>in</strong>g values of /e/<br />

i e a o u i e a o u<br />

+ – – – + high + +<br />

– – + – – low +<br />

– – + + + back + + +<br />

– – – + + round + +<br />

c. Complement rules<br />

i. [ ] [–high] ii. [ ] [–low]<br />

iii. [ ] [–back] iv. [ ] [–round]<br />

S<strong>in</strong>ce underly<strong>in</strong>g representations consist essentially of privative features,<br />

the Dist<strong>in</strong>ctness Condition is not <strong>in</strong> effect. Once it has been decided that /e/ is<br />

the unspecified vowel and its features have been removed, the ma<strong>in</strong> pr<strong>in</strong>ciple<br />

govern<strong>in</strong>g the specification of the rest of the phonemes is m<strong>in</strong>imality of<br />

specification. Look<strong>in</strong>g at (5.22b), we see that the features [high]] and [low] divide<br />

the vowels <strong>in</strong>to three sets: /i, u/, /e, o/, and /a/. It rema<strong>in</strong>s to make a further<br />

division <strong>in</strong> each of /i, u/ and /e, o/. Either feature [back] or [round] will suffice<br />

to do this. Archangeli chooses to dispense with [back], presumably because /a/,<br />

which requires no specifications beyond [+low], has a specification for [back] but<br />

not for [round]; therefore, [round] results <strong>in</strong> fewer specifications, respect<strong>in</strong>g<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!