1822 - Edocs
1822 - Edocs
1822 - Edocs
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
192<br />
little labour, and will afford a communication to facilitate<br />
the intercourse between that pant of the Territory<br />
and the southern states—the establishment uf this road<br />
was deemed an object of ^e iftm -st importance to the<br />
province of East Florida, by the British Government,<br />
your memorialists are induced to believe that the policy<br />
and necessity of such measures will be morestrongiy felt<br />
by the Government of the'United States.*<br />
Your memorialists would beg leave particularly to di-<br />
(rect the attention of the Congress of ene United States to<br />
the necessity of erecting light houses at l^nsacola, and<br />
St. Augustine, and also to provide some law upon the<br />
subject of wrecking at the peninsula of Florida, which is<br />
now in the hands of foreigners, and subject to the absolute<br />
controul of the colonies'of Great BritamJand Spain, and<br />
is frequently made the pretext for piracy and smuggling.<br />
Another subject to which the Legislative Council will<br />
call the attention of Congress, is the organization of the<br />
judiciary in this Territory, by reference to the act ^-i' Congress,<br />
it will be found that two district courts are established,<br />
one in East, and the other in West Florida; those<br />
courts are vested with jurisdiction, in civil and criminal<br />
cases, without an appeal from their decisions, to aay other<br />
tribunal, only where they entertain jurisdiction in<br />
their federal capacity, it follows therefore, that the act >of<br />
Congress, has vested in one judge power over the lives,<br />
liberties and property, of the citizens of , this Territory,<br />
without providing for an appeal or writ of error, to correct<br />
a judgment rendered by misconception uf the law,<br />
partiality or judicial impetuosity, whatever confidence we<br />
may repose in the virtues of our judges, or the upright<br />
integrity of the American bench, your memorialists conceive<br />
that it is a novel and dangerous power, inconsistent<br />
with the policy of our government, and contrary to the<br />
usual course in relation to all the other Territories, in all<br />
of which, if they are not mistaken, three judges have been<br />
appointed who were required to hold courts in different<br />
parts of the Territories, and once or twice a year, hold a<br />
court of errors and appeals, in all cases arising under the<br />
territorial laws. Two judges are incompetent to form<br />
such a connective tribunal,—to supply the deficiencies in<br />
the judiciary system as regulated by the act of Congress,<br />
the Legislative Council considered it incumbent upon<br />
them to establish inferior courts, as a temporary expedient<br />
making it the duty of the judges of the inferior courts<br />
to hold pleas in the several counties, with an appeal from<br />
their decision to the district court of the United States ;<br />
we believe this course to be indispensable to the convenience<br />
of large settlements, remote from St. Augustine,<br />
and Pensacola, a contrary policy would have subjected<br />
them to great inconvenience, and in many instances