06.05.2013 Views

Daily Life of the Ancient Greeks

Daily Life of the Ancient Greeks

Daily Life of the Ancient Greeks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The People 73<br />

Arranged marriages were <strong>the</strong> norm in Greek society, though a<br />

mature suitor would negotiate on his own behalf with his future<br />

bride’s parents. In <strong>the</strong> following passage, a fictional character called<br />

Ischomachos, invented by Xenophon, who is intended to be typical<br />

<strong>of</strong> many upper-crust A<strong>the</strong>nians, informs his wife how he came to<br />

choose her as his bride:<br />

Have you ever wondered why it was that I married you and why your<br />

parents gave you to me? It wasn’t just because I wanted someone beside<br />

me in bed at night. You realize that, don’t you? What happened was as<br />

follows. Your parents were looking for a suitable son-in-law and I was<br />

looking for a suitable wife. I chose you and <strong>the</strong>y, from among a number <strong>of</strong><br />

possibilities, chose me. (Household Management 7.10–11)<br />

Evidently, his wife’s wishes did not figure in <strong>the</strong> negotiations.<br />

Regrettably, Xenophon does not describe how she reacted on<br />

learning <strong>of</strong> her husband’s passionless courtship <strong>of</strong> her parents.<br />

Although Ischomachos was able to exercise independence in <strong>the</strong><br />

choice <strong>of</strong> his bride, younger men were required to follow <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

fa<strong>the</strong>rs’ wishes.<br />

Such evidence as we possess suggests that wealth and status,<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than emotional attachment, were <strong>the</strong> principal criteria for<br />

choosing a wife. Mercenary and cynical though this system may<br />

seem, we need to bear in mind that <strong>the</strong>re were few opportunities<br />

for <strong>the</strong> creation <strong>of</strong> wealth in ancient Greece. A marriage alliance<br />

was <strong>the</strong>refore an opportunity both to produce <strong>of</strong>fspring and to<br />

increase <strong>the</strong> family’s finances. A girl would almost invariably have<br />

been provided with a dowry, because, without one, she risked ending<br />

her forlorn life “unwed and barren” (Sophokles, Oedipus <strong>the</strong><br />

King, line 1502). The marriage was <strong>the</strong>refore preceded by a formal<br />

agreement (enguê, literally “pledge”), consequent upon both<br />

parties having negotiated <strong>the</strong> dowry. Dowries, which generally<br />

consisted <strong>of</strong> both money and valuables, varied greatly in size. The<br />

aristocratic politician Alkibiades received <strong>the</strong> huge sum <strong>of</strong> 10 talents<br />

when he married <strong>the</strong> sister <strong>of</strong> Kallias, one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wealthiest<br />

men <strong>of</strong> his day. Because <strong>the</strong> function <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dowry was to provide<br />

maintenance for <strong>the</strong> wife, legal restraints were imposed upon its<br />

use. In <strong>the</strong> event <strong>of</strong> divorce, for instance, <strong>the</strong> husband was required<br />

to return it intact ei<strong>the</strong>r to his wife’s fa<strong>the</strong>r or to her legal guardian.<br />

If he was unable to repay <strong>the</strong> entire sum, he was required to pay<br />

interest on it. The wife’s personal possessions were also returned<br />

to her family. The orator Isaios informs us that, when Menekles

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!