05.06.2013 Views

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

Recasting Citizenship for Development - File UPI

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86 P. THAMIZOLI AND P. IGNATIUS PRABHAKAR<br />

in 1978, some of the Irulas of this area were able to mobilise themselves.<br />

They made attempts to initiate a dialogue with the institutions of the<br />

state. During that process, NGOs were identified as the only potential<br />

supporters. But in the initial phase, NGOs were unable to produce any<br />

authentic evidence and could not succeed in helping the Irulas to establish<br />

their identity. Without a community certificate, the Irulas encountered<br />

critical practical problems in their daily lives. They were unable to get<br />

ration cards (to buy grains at subsidised rates from the government shops<br />

of the Public Distribution System), or send their children to school. They<br />

were also deprived of any special benefits from government programmes<br />

meant <strong>for</strong> tribal groups.<br />

Several interactions with government officials at different levels, from<br />

the Village Administrative Officer to the Regional Revenue Officer, who<br />

are responsible <strong>for</strong> issuing the community certificate, did not yield any<br />

positive result. As the villagers were not able to provide strong evidence<br />

due to their nomadic past, their request was repeatedly declined. When it<br />

was mentioned that some of the Irulas continued to practise rat-hunting,<br />

the official was not convinced. The official’s attitude of searching in the<br />

present <strong>for</strong> a conventional document <strong>for</strong> past practices and his lack of<br />

understanding of the dynamics of a socio-cultural system determined<br />

the negative response.<br />

It was during the colonial period that tribal groups all over India were<br />

listed <strong>for</strong> the first time. In subsequent years, the list was modified a little,<br />

with some additions and omissions. Article 366 (25) of the Constitution<br />

of India refers to Scheduled Tribes as those communities who are scheduled<br />

in accordance with Article 342 of the Constitution; the Scheduled<br />

Tribes are the tribes or tribal communities who have been declared as<br />

such by the President through a public notification. The criterion <strong>for</strong><br />

defining the word ‘tribe’ is not spelt out in the Constitution, but some of<br />

the essential characteristics of these communities are: primitive traits,<br />

geographical location, distinct culture, shyness when it comes to contact<br />

with the community at large; and economic backwardness. Anthropologists<br />

are multi-vocal in defining the word ‘tribe’ in the Indian context;<br />

however, elaborating this historical discourse is beyond the scope of<br />

this chapter.<br />

The official tribal list in Tamil Nadu, which was compiled a long time<br />

ago, is a slightly modified version of that prepared by the British. According

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!